What CloudSat cannot see: liquid water content profiles inferred from MODIS and CALIOP observations
-
Published:2023-07-25
Issue:14
Volume:16
Page:3531-3546
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Schulte Richard M., Lebsock Matthew D.ORCID, Haynes John M.
Abstract
Abstract. Single-layer nonprecipitating warm clouds are integral to
Earth's climate, and accurate estimates of cloud liquid water content for
these clouds are critical for constraining cloud models and understanding
climate feedbacks. As the only cloud-sensitive radar currently in space,
CloudSat provides very important cloud-profiling capabilities. However, a
significant fraction of clouds is missed by CloudSat because they are
either too thin or too close to the Earth's surface. We find that the
CloudSat Radar-Visible Optical Depth Cloud Water Content Product, 2B-CWC-RVOD, misses about 73 % of nonprecipitating liquid
cloudy pixels and about 63 % of total nonprecipitating liquid cloud
water content compared to coincident Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) observations. Those percentages
increase to 84 % and 69 %, respectively, if MODIS “partly cloudy”
pixels are included. We develop a method, based on adiabatic parcel theory
but modified to account for the fact that observed clouds are often
subadiabatic, to estimate profiles of cloud liquid water content based on
MODIS observations of cloud-top effective radius and cloud optical depth
combined with lidar observations of cloud-top height. We find that, for
cloudy pixels that are detected by CloudSat, the resulting subadiabatic
profiles of cloud water are similar to what is retrieved from CloudSat. For
cloudy pixels that are not detected by CloudSat, the subadiabatic profiles
can be used to supplement the CloudSat profiles, recovering much of the
missing cloud water and generating realistic-looking merged profiles of
cloud water. Adding this missing cloud water to the CWC-RVOD product
increases the mean cloud liquid water path by 228 % for single-layer
nonprecipitating warm clouds. This method will be included in a subsequent
reprocessing of the 2B-CWC-RVOD algorithm.
Funder
Earth Sciences Division
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference51 articles.
1. Boers, R., Acarreta, J. R., and Gras, J. L.: Satellite monitoring of the first indirect aerosol effect: Retrieval of the droplet concentration of water clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D22208, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006838, 2006. 2. Brenguier, J.-L., Pawlowska, H., Schüller, L., Preusker, R., Fischer,
J., and Fouquart, Y.: Radiative Properties of Boundary Layer Clouds: Droplet
Effective Radius versus Number Concentration, J. Atmos.
Sci., 57, 803–821, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0803:RPOBLC>2.0.CO;2, 2000. 3. Brenguier, J.-L., Pawlowska, H., and Schüller, L.: Cloud microphysical
and radiative properties for parameterization and satellite monitoring of
the indirect effect of aerosol on climate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, D158632, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002682, 2003. 4. Cess, R. D., Potter, G. L., Blanchet, J. P., Boer, G. J., Ghan, S. J.,
Kiehl, J. T., Le Treut, H., Li, Z.-X., Liang, X.-Z., Mitchell, J. F. B.,
Morcrette, J.-J., Randall, D. A., Riches, M. R., Roeckner, E., Schlese, U.,
Slingo, A., Taylor, K. E., Washington, W. M., Wetherald, R. T., and Yagai,
I.: Interpretation of Cloud-Climate Feedback as Produced by 14 Atmospheric
General Circulation Models, Science, 245, 513–516,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4917.513, 1989. 5. Christensen, M. W., Stephens, G. L., and Lebsock, M. D.: Exposing biases in
retrieved low cloud properties from CloudSat: A guide for evaluating
observations and climate data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
118, 12120–12131, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020224, 2013.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|