Using MODIS derived <i>f</i>PAR with ground based flux tower measurements to derive the light use efficiency for two Canadian peatlands
-
Published:2009-02-19
Issue:2
Volume:6
Page:225-234
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Connolly J.,Roulet N. T.,Seaquist J. W.,Holden N. M.,Lafleur P. M.,Humphreys E. R.,Heumann B. W.,Ward S. M.
Abstract
Abstract. We used satellite remote sensing data; fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by vegetation (fPAR) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) in combination with tower eddy covariance and meteorological measurements to characterise the Light Use Efficiency parameter (ε) variability and the maximum ε (εmax) for two contrasting Canadian peatlands. Eight-day MODIS fPAR data were acquired for the Mer Bleue (2000 to 2003) and Western Peatland (2004). Flux tower eddy covariance and meteorological measurements were integrated to the same eight-day time stamps as the MODIS fPAR data. A light use efficiency model: GPP = ε×APAR (where GPP is Gross Primary Productivity and APAR is absorbed photosynthetically active radiation) was used to calculate ε. The εmax value for each year (2000 to 2003) at the Mer Bleue bog ranged from 0.58 g C MJ−1 to 0.78 g C MJ−1 and was 0.91 g C MJ−1 in 2004, for the Western Peatland. The average growing season ε for the Mer Bleue bog for the four year period was 0.35 g C MJ−1 and for the Western Peatland in 2004 was 0.57 g C MJ−1. The average snow free period for the Mer Bleue bog over the four years was 0.27 g C MJ−1 and for the Western Peatland in 2004 was 0.39 g C MJ−1. Using the light use efficiency method we calculated the εmax and the annual variability in ε for two Canadian peatlands. We determined that temperature was a growth-limiting factor at both sites Vapour Pressure Deficit (VPD) however was not. MODIS fPAR is a useful tool for the characterization of ε at flux tower sites.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference61 articles.
1. Ahl, D. E., Gower, S. T., Mackay, D. S., Burrows, S. N., Norman, J. M., and Diak, G. R.: Heterogeneity of light use efficiency in a northern Wisconsin forest: implications for modelling net primary production with remote sensing, Remote Sens. Environ., 93, 168–178., 2004. 2. Ahl, D. E., Gower, S. T., Mackay, D. S., Burrows, S. N., Norman, J. M., and Diak, G. R.: The effects of aggregated land cover data on estimating NPP in northern Wisconsin, Remote Sens. Environ., 97, 1–14, 2005. 3. Albritton, D. L. and Meira Filho, L. G.: Technical summary of the working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel of climate change, Cambridge: Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change, 21–83, 2001. 4. Arneth, A., Kurbatova, J., Kolle, O., Shistova, O. B., Lloyd, J., Vygodskaya, N. N., and Schulze, E.-D.: Comparative ecosystem–atmosphere exchange of energy and mass in a European Russian and a central Siberian bog II. Interseasonal and interannual variability of CO2 fluxes, Tellus, 54B, 514–530, 2002. 5. Aurela, M., Laurila, T., and Tuovinen, J.-P.: Annual CO2 balances of a subarctic fen in northern Europe: Importance of the wintertime efflux, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D21), 4607, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002055, 2002.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|