ELIFAN, an algorithm for the estimation of cloud cover from sky imagers
-
Published:2019-10-21
Issue:10
Volume:12
Page:5519-5534
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Lothon Marie, Barnéoud Paul, Gabella Omar, Lohou FabienneORCID, Derrien Solène, Rondi Sylvain, Chiriaco Marjolaine, Bastin Sophie, Dupont Jean-Charles, Haeffelin Martial, Badosa JordiORCID, Pascal Nicolas, Montoux Nadège
Abstract
Abstract. In the context of a network of sky cameras installed on atmospheric multi-instrumented sites,
we present an algorithm named ELIFAN, which aims to estimate the cloud cover amount
from full-sky visible daytime images with a common principle and procedure.
ELIFAN was initially developed for a self-made full-sky image system presented in this article and adapted to a set of other systems in the network.
It is based on red-to-blue ratio thresholding for the distinction of cloudy and cloud-free pixels of the image
and on the use of a cloud-free sky library, without taking account of aerosol loading.
Both an absolute (without the use of a cloud-free reference image)
and a differential (based on a cloud-free reference image) red-to-blue ratio thresholding are used. An evaluation of the algorithm based on a 1-year-long series of images shows that the proposed algorithm
is very convincing for most of the images, with about 97 % of relevance in the process, outside the sunrise and sunset transitions.
During those latter periods, however, ELIFAN has large difficulties in appropriately processing the image due to a large difference in color composition
and potential confusion between cloud-free and cloudy sky at that time.
This issue also impacts the library of cloud-free images. Beside this, the library also reveals some limitations during daytime,
with the possible presence of very small and/or thin clouds. However, the latter have only a small impact on the cloud cover estimate. The two thresholding methodologies, the absolute and the differential red-to-blue ratio thresholding processes,
agree very well, with departure usually below 8 % except in sunrise–sunset periods and in some specific conditions.
The use of the cloud-free image library gives generally better results than the absolute process.
It particularly better detects thin cirrus clouds.
But the absolute thresholding process turns out to be better sometimes, for example in some cases in which the sun is hidden by a cloud.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference57 articles.
1. Allmen, M. C. and Kegelmeyer, W. P.: The computation of cloud-base height from
paired whole-sky imaging cameras, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 13, 97–113,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0097:tcocbh>2.0.co;2, 1996. a 2. Benech, B., Dessens, J., Charpentier, C., and Sauvageot, H.: Thermodynamic and
microphysical impact of a 1000 MW heat-released source into the atmospheric
environment, Proceeding of the Third WMO Scientific Conference on Weather
Modification, 21–25 July 1980, 111–118, 1980. a 3. Blazek, M. and Pata, P.: Colour transformations and K-means segmentation for
automatic cloud detection, Meteorol. Z., 24, 503–509,
https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2015/0656, 2015. a, b 4. Calbó, J. and Sabburg, J.: Feature extraction from whole-sky ground-based images
for cloud-type recognition, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,
25, 3–14, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jtecha959.1, 2008. a, b 5. Cazorla, A., Olmo, F. J., and Alados-Arboledasl, L.: Development of a sky
imager for cloud cover assessment, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 25, 29–39, https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.25.000029,
2008. a, b, c
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|