The impact of neglecting ice phase on cloud optical depth retrievals from AERONET cloud mode observations
-
Published:2019-09-23
Issue:9
Volume:12
Page:5087-5099
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Shonk Jonathan K. P., Chiu Jui-Yuan ChristineORCID, Marshak Alexander, Giles David M.ORCID, Huang Chiung-Huei, Mace Gerald G., Benson SallyORCID, Slutsker Ilya, Holben Brent N.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Clouds present many challenges to climate modelling. To
develop and verify the parameterisations needed to allow climate models to
represent cloud structure and processes, there is a need for high-quality
observations of cloud optical depth from locations around the world.
Retrievals of cloud optical depth are obtainable from radiances measured by
Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) radiometers in “cloud mode” using a
two-wavelength retrieval method. However, the method is unable to detect
cloud phase, and hence assumes that all of the cloud in a profile is liquid.
This assumption has the potential to introduce errors into long-term
statistics of retrieved optical depth for clouds that also contain ice.
Using a set of idealised cloud profiles we find that, for optical depths
above 20, the fractional error in retrieved optical depth is a linear
function of the fraction of the optical depth that is due to the presence of
ice cloud (“ice fraction”). Clouds that are entirely ice have positive
errors with magnitudes of the order of 55 % to 70 %. We derive a simple linear
equation that can be used as a correction at AERONET sites where ice
fraction can be independently estimated. Using this linear equation, we estimate the magnitude of the error for a set
of cloud profiles from five sites of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement
programme. The dataset contains separate retrievals of ice and liquid
retrievals; hence ice fraction can be estimated. The magnitude of the error
at each location was related to the relative frequencies of occurrence in
thick frontal cloud at the mid-latitude sites and of deep convection at the
tropical sites – that is, of deep cloud containing both ice and liquid
particles. The long-term mean optical depth error at the five locations
spans the range 2–4, which we show to be small enough to allow calculation
of top-of-atmosphere flux to within 10 % and surface flux to about
15 %.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference47 articles.
1. Antón, M., Alados-Arboledas, L., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Costa, M. J., Chiu, J., and Olmo, F. J.: Experimental and modeled UV erythemal irradiance under overcast conditions: the role of cloud optical depth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11723–11732, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11723-2012, 2012. 2. Arking, A. and Childs, J. D.: Retrieval of cloud cover parameters from
multispectral images, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 24, 322–333, 1985. 3. Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility, 2019, updated hourly, Atmospheric State, Cloud Microphysics & Radiative Flux (60MACEMICROPHYS), Years 2005 to 2010; Southern Great Plains (SGP), North Slope of Alaska (NSA) and Tropical Western Pacific (TWP), ARM Data Center, available at: https://www.arm.gov/data/data-sources/atmcldradmace-19, last access: 11 January 2019. 4. Barja, B., Bennouna, Y., Toledano, C., Antuña, J. C., Cachorro, V.,
Hernández, C., de Frutos, Á., and Estevan, R.: Cloud optical depth
measurements with sun-photometer in Camagüey, Cuba, Óptica Pura y Aplicada, 45, 389–396, 2012. 5. Barker, H. W. and Marshak, A.: Inferring optical depth of broken clouds
above green vegetation using surface solar radiometric measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 3989–3006, 2001.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|