Tsunami hazard in Lombok and Bali, Indonesia, due to the Flores back-arc thrust
-
Published:2022-05-18
Issue:5
Volume:22
Page:1665-1682
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Felix Raquel P.ORCID, Hubbard Judith A., Bradley Kyle E., Lythgoe Karen H., Li LinlinORCID, Switzer Adam D.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The tsunami hazard posed by the Flores back-arc thrust, which runs
along the northern coast of the islands of Bali and Lombok, Indonesia, is
poorly studied compared to the Sunda Megathrust, situated ∼250 km to the south of the islands. However, the 2018 Lombok earthquake
sequence demonstrated the seismic potential of the western Flores Thrust
when a fault ramp beneath the island of Lombok ruptured in two Mw 6.9
earthquakes. Although the uplift in these events mostly occurred below land,
the sequence still generated local tsunamis along the northern coast of
Lombok. Historical records show that the Flores fault system in the Lombok
and Bali region has generated at least six ≥Ms 6.5 tsunamigenic
earthquakes since 1800 CE. Hence, it is important to assess the possible
tsunami hazard represented by this fault system. Here, we focus on the
submarine fault segment located between the islands of Lombok and Bali
(below the Lombok Strait). We assess modeled tsunami patterns generated by
fault slip in six earthquake scenarios (slip of 1–5 m, representing Mw 7.2–7.9+) using deterministic modeling, with a focus on impacts on the
capital cities of Mataram, Lombok, and Denpasar, Bali, which lie on the
coasts facing the strait. We use a geologically constrained earthquake model
informed by the Lombok earthquake sequence, together with a high-resolution
bathymetry dataset developed by combining direct measurements from the General Bathymetric Chart of the
Oceans (GEBCO)
with sounding measurements from the official nautical charts for Indonesia.
Our results show that fault rupture in this region could trigger a tsunami
reaching Mataram in <9 min and Denpasar in ∼ 23–27 min, with multiple waves. For an earthquake with 3–5 m of
coseismic slip, Mataram and Denpasar experience maximum wave heights of
∼ 1.6–2.7 and ∼ 0.6–1.4 m, respectively.
Furthermore, our earthquake models indicate that both cities would
experience coseismic subsidence of 20–40 cm, exacerbating their exposure to
both the tsunami and other coastal hazards. Overall, Mataram is more
exposed than Denpasar to high tsunami waves arriving quickly from the fault
source. To understand how a tsunami would affect Mataram, we model the
associated inundation using the 5 m slip model and show that Mataram is
inundated ∼ 55–140 m inland along the northern coast and
∼230 m along the southern coast, with maximum flow depths of
∼ 2–3 m. Our study highlights that the early tsunami arrival
in Mataram, Lombok, gives little time for residents to evacuate. Raising
their awareness about the potential for locally generated tsunamis and the
need for evacuation plans is important to help them respond immediately
after experiencing strong ground shaking.
Funder
Earth Observatory of Singapore National Research Foundation Singapore Ministry of Education - Singapore National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference87 articles.
1. Afif, H. and Cipta, A.: Tsunami hazard map in eastern Bali, AIP Conf. Proc.,
1658, 050001, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4915041, 2015. 2. Ammon, C. J., Kanamori, H., and Lay, T.: A great earthquake doublet and
seismic stress transfer cycle in the central Kuril islands, Nature, 451,
561–565, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06521, 2008. 3. Beckers, J. and Lay, T.: Very broadband seismic analysis of the 1992 Flores,
Indonesia, earthquake (Mw=7.9), J. Geophys. Res., 100, 18179–18193, https://doi.org/10.1029/95jb01689, 1995. 4. Behrens, J., Løvholt, F., Jalayer, F., Lorito, S., Salgado-Gálvez, M.
A., Sørensen, M., Abadie, S., Aguirre-Ayerbe, I., Aniel-Quiroga, I.,
Babeyko, A., Baiguera, M., Basili, R., Belliazzi, S., Grezio, A., Johnson,
K., Murphy, S., Paris, R., Rafliana, I., De Risi, R., Rossetto, T., Selva,
J., Taroni, M., Del Zoppo, M., Armigliato, A., Bureš, V., Cech, P.,
Cecioni, C., Christodoulides, P., Davies, G., Dias, F., Bayraktar, H. B.,
González, M., Gritsevich, M., Guillas, S., Harbitz, C. B., Kânoglu,
U., Macías, J., Papadopoulos, G. A., Polet, J., Romano, F., Salamon,
A., Scala, A., Stepinac, M., Tappin, D. R., Thio, H. K., Tonini, R.,
Triantafyllou, I., Ulrich, T., Varini, E., Volpe, M., and Vyhmeister, E.:
Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard and Risk Analysis: A Review of Research Gaps,
Front. Earth Sci., 9, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.628772,
2021. 5. Bilek, S. L.: Invited review paper: Seismicity along the South American
subduction zone: Review of large earthquakes, tsunamis, and subduction zone
complexity, Tectonophysics, 495, 2–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.02.037, 2010.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|