Invited perspectives: A research agenda towards disaster risk management pathways in multi-(hazard-)risk assessment
-
Published:2022-04-26
Issue:4
Volume:22
Page:1487-1497
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Ward Philip J., Daniell James, Duncan Melanie, Dunne Anna, Hananel Cédric, Hochrainer-Stigler Stefan, Tijssen Annegien, Torresan Silvia, Ciurean RoxanaORCID, Gill Joel C.ORCID, Sillmann JanaORCID, Couasnon AnaïsORCID, Koks ElcoORCID, Padrón-Fumero Noemi, Tatman Sharon, Tronstad Lund MarianneORCID, Adesiyun Adewole, Aerts Jeroen C. J. H., Alabaster Alexander, Bulder Bernard, Campillo Torres Carlos, Critto AndreaORCID, Hernández-Martín Raúl, Machado Marta, Mysiak JaroslavORCID, Orth ReneORCID, Palomino Antolín Irene, Petrescu Eva-Cristina, Reichstein Markus, Tiggeloven TimothyORCID, Van Loon Anne F.ORCID, Vuong Pham HungORCID, de Ruiter Marleen C.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Whilst the last decades have seen a clear shift in emphasis from managing natural hazards to managing risk, the majority of natural-hazard risk research still focuses on single hazards. Internationally, there are calls for more attention for multi-hazards and multi-risks. Within the European Union (EU), the concepts of multi-hazard and multi-risk assessment and management have taken centre stage in recent years. In this perspective paper, we outline several key developments in multi-(hazard-)risk research in the last decade, with a particular focus on the EU. We present challenges for multi-(hazard-)risk management as outlined in several research projects and papers. We then present a research agenda for addressing these challenges. We argue for an approach that addresses multi-(hazard-)risk management through the lens of sustainability challenges that cut across sectors, regions, and hazards. In this approach, the starting point is a specific sustainability challenge, rather than an
individual hazard or sector, and trade-offs and synergies are examined
across sectors, regions, and hazards. We argue for in-depth case studies in
which various approaches for multi-(hazard-)risk management are co-developed and tested in practice. Finally, we present a new pan-European research project in which our proposed research agenda will be implemented, with the goal of enabling stakeholders to develop forward-looking disaster risk management pathways that assess trade-offs and synergies of various strategies across sectors, hazards, and spatial scales.
Funder
European Commission
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference57 articles.
1. Aronsson-Storrier, M.: Sendai Five Years on: Reflections on the Role of
International Law in the Creation and Reduction of Disaster Risk, Int. J.
Disast. Risk Sc., 11, 230–238, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00265-y, 2020. 2. Bengal, W.: On the coins of the Patan, Afghan or Ghori Sultans of Hindustan
(Delhi), The Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Numismatic Society, 9,
79–172, 1847. 3. Bloemen, P., Reeder, T., Zevenbergen, C., Rijke, J., and Kingsborough, A.:
Lessons learned from applying adaptation pathways in flood risk management
and challenges for the further development of this approach, Mitig. Adapt.
Strat. Gl., 23, 1083–1108, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9773-9, 2018. 4. Bostock, J. and Riley, H. T.: The natural history of Pliny, H. G. Bohn,
London, UK, 1857. 5. Bouwer, L. M.: Observed and projected impacts from extreme weather events:
implications for loss and damage, in: Loss and Damage from Climate Change,
edited by: Mechler, R., Bouwer, L. M., Schinko, T., Surminski, S., and
Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 63–82,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72026-5, 2018.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|