Reconstruction of wind and surge of the 1906 storm tide at the German North Sea coast
-
Published:2022-07-22
Issue:7
Volume:22
Page:2419-2432
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Meyer Elke Magda IngeORCID, Weisse RalfORCID, Grabemann Iris, Tinz Birger, Scholz Robert
Abstract
Abstract. Storm tides represent a major threat to the low-lying German North Sea
coast. Knowledge of extremes is essential for the design of reliable and
robust coastal defences. A storm tide that occurred on 12–13 March 1906
along the German Bight coastline still represents one of the strongest
events on record. For this event, detailed knowledge of atmospheric and
hydrodynamic conditions is still lacking. To assess the potential impact of
such an event on today's coastline, century-long atmospheric reanalysis data
together with a manual synoptic reconstruction based on archived weather
data were used to drive a tide-surge model and to simulate water levels
during the event. Sensitivity experiments were performed to estimate
potential amplification of water levels that could have been caused by
different time lags between the storm and the astronomical tide. Comparison
between the model results and the limited available observational data
indicated that the water levels could be reasonably reconstructed using
wind fields from the manual synoptic approach and some of the reanalysis
ensemble members. The amplification potential was found to be low because
the storm occurred during spring tide and shifts in the phase of the
astronomic tide yielded only small changes in total water levels. To
summarise, if pressure data are available at relevant locations, historical
storm surges can be simulated with reanalysis products and also with a
manual synoptic reconstruction.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference36 articles.
1. Brecht, B. and Frank, H.: OptempS-MohoWif Optimierung empirischer
Sturmflutvorhersagen und Modellierung hoch auflösender Windfelder
(Teilprojekt B: Modellierung hoch auflösender Windfelder an der
deutschen Nordseeküste), https://izw.baw.de/publikationen/kfki-projekte-berichte/0/108_2_1_e36167.pdf (last access: 11 July 2022), 2015. 2. Buizza, R., Brönnimann, S., Haimberger, L., Laloyaux, P., Martin, M. J., Fuentes, M., Alonso-Balmaseda, M., Becker, A., Blaschek, M., Dahlgren, P., de Boisseson, E., Dee, D., Doutriaux-Boucher, M., Feng, X., John, V. O., Haines, K., Jourdain, S., Kosaka, Y., Lea, D., Lemarié, F., Mayer, M., Messina, P., Perruche, C., Peylin, P., Pullainen, J., Rayner, N., Rustemeier, E., Schepers, D., Saunders, R., Schulz, J., Sterin, A., Stichelberger, S., Storto, A., Testut, C., Valente, M., Vidard, A., Vuichard, N., Weaver, A., While, J., and Ziese, M.: The EU-FP7 ERA-CLIM2 Project Contribution to Advancing Science and Production of Earth System Climate Reanalyses, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 1003–1014, 2018. 3. Callies, U., Plüß, A., Kappenberg, J., and Kapitza, H.: Particle
tracking in the vicinity of Helgoland, North Sea: a model comparison, Ocean
Dynam., 61, 2121–2139, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-011-0474-8, 2011. 4. Casulli, V. and Cattani, E.: Stability, accuracy and efficiency of a
semi-implicit method for three-dimensional shallow water flow, Comput. Math.
Appl., 27, 99–112, 1994. 5. Cavaleri, L., Bajo, M., Barbariol, F., Bastianini, M., Benetazzo, A.,
Bertotti, L., Chiggiato, J., Ferrarin, C., Trincardi, F., and Umgiesser, G.: The 2019 Flooding of Venice and its implications for future
predictions, Oceanography, 33, 42–49, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2020.105, 2020.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|