Schools of all backgrounds can do physics research – on the accessibility and equity of the Physics Research in School Environments (PRiSE) approach to independent research projects
-
Published:2021-04-08
Issue:2
Volume:4
Page:189-208
-
ISSN:2569-7110
-
Container-title:Geoscience Communication
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Commun.
Abstract
Abstract. Societal biases are a major issue in school students' access to and
interaction with science. School engagement programmes in science
from universities, like independent research projects, which could
try and tackle these problems are, however, often inequitable. We
evaluate these concerns applied to one such programme, Physics Research
in School Environments (PRiSE), which features projects in space
science, astronomy, and particle physics. Comparing the schools involved
with PRiSE to those of other similar schemes and UK national statistics,
we find that PRiSE has engaged a much more diverse set of schools with significantly more disadvantaged groups than is typical. While
drop-off occurs within the protracted programme, we find no evidence
of systematic biases present. The majority of schools that complete
projects return for multiple years with the programme, with this repeated
buy-in from schools again being unpatterned by typical societal inequalities. Therefore, a school's ability to succeed in independent research projects
appears independent of background within the PRiSE framework. Qualitative
feedback from teachers shows that the diversity and equity of the programme,
which they attribute to the level of support offered through PRiSE's
framework, is valued, and they have highlighted further ways of making
the projects potentially even more accessible. Researcher involvement,
uncommon in many other programmes, along with teacher engagement and
communication are found to be key elements to success in independent
research projects overall.
Funder
Science and Technology Facilities Council Queen Mary University of London
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference35 articles.
1. Archer, M. O.: So you're looking to run a research in schools project?
Practical tips from the evaluation of a pilot programme, Tech. rep.,
SEPnet, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25674.06088, 2017. a 2. Archer, M. O. and DeWitt, J.: “Thanks for helping me find my enthusiasm for physics”: the lasting impacts “research in schools” projects can have on students,
teachers, and schools, Geosci. Commun., 4, 169–188,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-169-2021, 2021. a 3. Archer, M. O., DeWitt, J., Thorley, C., and Keenan, O.: Evaluating participants' experience of extended interaction with cutting-edge
physics research through the PRiSE “research in schools” programme, Geosci. Commun., 4, 147–168, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-147-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d, e 4. Bennett, J., Dunlop, L., Knox, K. J., Reiss, M. J., and Torrance Jenkins, R.: A Rapid Evidence Review of Practical Independent Research Projects in
Science, Tech. rep., Wellcome Trust, London, 2016. a, b, c, d 5. Bennett, J., Dunlop, L., Know, K. J., Reiss, M. J., and Torrance Jenkins, R.: Practical independent research projects in science: a synthesis and
evaluation of the evidence of impact on high school students, Int. J. Sci.
Educ., 40, 1755–1773, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1511936, 2018. a, b, c, d
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|