Will daytime community calcification reflect reef accretion on future, degraded coral reefs?
-
Published:2022-02-14
Issue:3
Volume:19
Page:891-906
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Lantz Coulson A.ORCID, Leggat William, Bergman Jessica L., Fordyce Alexander, Page Charlotte, Mesaglio ThomasORCID, Ainsworth Tracy D.
Abstract
Abstract. Coral bleaching events continue to drive the degradation of coral reefs
worldwide, causing a shift in the benthic community from coral- to algae-dominated ecosystems. Critically, this shift may decrease the capacity of
degraded coral reef communities to maintain net positive accretion during
warming-driven stress events (e.g., reef-wide coral bleaching). Here we
measured rates of net ecosystem calcification (NEC) and net ecosystem
production (NEP) on a degraded coral reef lagoon community (coral cover
< 10 % and algae cover > 20 %) during a reef-wide
bleaching event in February 2020 at Heron Island on the Great Barrier
Reef. We found that during this bleaching event, rates of NEP and NEC across
replicate transects remained positive and did not change in response to
bleaching. Repeated benthic surveys over a period of 20 d indicated an
increase in the percent area of bleached coral tissue, corroborated by
relatively low Symbiodiniaceae densities (∼ 0.6 × 106 cm−2) and dark-adapted photosynthetic yields in photosystem II of
corals (∼ 0.5) sampled along each transect over this period.
Given that a clear decline in coral health was not reflected in the overall
NEC estimates, it is possible that elevated temperatures in the water column
that compromise coral health enhanced the thermodynamic favorability for
calcification in other ahermatypic benthic calcifiers. These data suggest
that positive NEC on degraded reefs may not equate to the net positive
accretion of a complex, three-dimensional reef structure in a future, warmer
ocean. Critically, our study highlights that if coral cover continues to
decline as predicted, NEC may no longer be an appropriate proxy for reef
growth as the proportion of the NEC signal owed to ahermatypic calcification
increases and coral dominance on the reef decreases.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference60 articles.
1. Anon: Halimeda composition and biomass along the Great Barrier Reef,
AIMS metadata, aims.gov.au, available at:
https://apps.aims.gov.au/metadata/view/7f7e70a0-c3db-472c-90d4-1ae243d8180b
(last access: 1 September 2020), 2020. 2. Anthony, K. R. N., Kline, D. I., Diaz-Pulido, G., Dove, S., and
Hoegh-Guldberg, O.: Ocean acidification causes bleaching and productivity
loss in coral reef builders, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105,
17442–17446, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804478105, 2008. 3. Albright, R., Benthuysen, J., Cantin, N., Caldeira, K., and Anthony, K.:
Coral reef metabolism and carbon chemistry dynamics of a coral reef flat,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3980–3988, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063488, 2015. 4. Bahr, K. D., Jokiel, P. L., and Rodgers, K. S.: Influence of solar irradiance
on underwater temperature recorded by temperature loggers on coral reefs,
Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 14, 338–342, https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10093, 2016. 5. Baird, A. H. and Marshall, P. A.: Mortality, growth and reproduction in
scleractinian corals following bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef, Mar.
Ecol. Prog. Ser., 237, 133–141, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps237133, 2002.
|
|