Two global data sets of daily fire emission injection heights since 2003
-
Published:2017-02-27
Issue:4
Volume:17
Page:2921-2942
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Rémy Samuel, Veira Andreas, Paugam RonanORCID, Sofiev Mikhail, Kaiser Johannes W.ORCID, Marenco FrancoORCID, Burton Sharon P., Benedetti AngelaORCID, Engelen Richard J.ORCID, Ferrare Richard, Hair Jonathan W.
Abstract
Abstract. The Global Fire Assimilation System (GFAS) assimilates fire radiative power (FRP) observations from satellite-based sensors to produce daily estimates of biomass burning emissions. It has been extended to include information about injection heights derived from fire observations and meteorological information from the operational weather forecasts of ECMWF. Injection heights are provided by two distinct methods: the Integrated Monitoring and Modelling System for wildland fires (IS4FIRES) parameterisation and the one-dimensional plume rise model (PRM). A global database of daily biomass burning emissions and injection heights at 0.1° resolution has been produced for 2003–2015 and is continuously extended in near-real time with the operational GFAS service of the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS). In this study, the two injection height data sets were compared with the new MPHP2 (MISR Plume Height Project 2) satellite-based plume height retrievals. The IS4FIRES parameterisation showed a better overall agreement than the observations, while the PRM was better at capturing the variability of injection heights. The performance of both parameterisations is also dependent on the type of vegetation. Furthermore, the use of biomass burning emission heights from GFAS in atmospheric composition forecasts was assessed in two case studies: the South AMerican Biomass Burning Analysis (SAMBBA) campaign which took place in September 2012 in Brazil, and a series of large fire events in the western USA in August 2013. For these case studies, forecasts of biomass burning aerosol species by the Composition Integrated Forecasting System (C-IFS) of CAMS were found to better reproduce the observed vertical distribution when using PRM injection heights from GFAS compared to aerosols emissions being prescribed at the surface. The globally available GFAS injection heights introduced and evaluated in this study provide a comprehensive data set for future fire and atmospheric composition modelling studies.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference72 articles.
1. Achtemeier, G. L., Goodrick, S. A., Liu, Y., Garcia-Menendez, F., Hu, Y., and Odman, M. T.: Modeling smoke plume rise and dispersion from southern United States prescribed burns with daysmoke, Atmosphere, 2, 358–388, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos2030358, 2011. 2. Ackerman, T. P. and Toon, O. B.: Absorption of visible radiation in atmosphere containing mixtures of absorbing and non-absorbing particles, Appl. Optics, 20, 3661–3667, 1981. 3. Andela, N., Kaiser, J. W., Heil, A., Van Leeuwen, T. T., van der Werf, G. R., Wooster, M. J., Remy, S., and Schultz, M. G.: Assessment of the Global Fire Assimilation System (GFASv1), available at: https://gmes-atmosphere.eu/documents/maccii/deliverables/fir (13 July 2016), 2013. 4. Andela, N., Kaiser, J. W., van der Werf, G. R., and Wooster, M. J.: New fire diurnal cycle characterizations to improve fire radiative energy assessments made from MODIS observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8831–8846, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8831-2015, 2015. 5. Andreae, M. O. and Merlet, P.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 955–966, 2001.
Cited by
69 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|