Validation of aerosol and cloud layer structures from the space-borne lidar CALIOP using Seoul National University ground-based lidar
Author:
Kim S.-W.,Berthier S.,Chazette P.,Raut J.-C.,Dulac F.,Yoon S.-C.
Abstract
Abstract. We present first observationally based validations of the space-borne lidar CALIOP onboard CALIPSO satellite using coincidental observations from a ground-based SNU lidar for 3 different types of atmospheric scenes. Both lidar measurements were taken in nearly same airmass in space and time. Total attenuated backscatters at 532 nm from the two instruments show similar aerosol and cloud layer structures (the top and bottom heights) both under cloud-free conditions and in case of multi-aerosol layers underlying semi-transparent cirrus clouds. This result confirms that the CALIPSO science team algorithms of the discrimination of cloud and aerosol as well as of their layer top and base altitudes are sound. Under thick clouds conditions, only information on the cloud top (bottom) height is reliable from CALIOP (ground-based lidar) observations due to strong signal attenuations. However, simultaneous space-borne CALIOP and ground-based SNU lidar measurements complement each other and provide full information on the vertical distribution of aerosols and clouds. Discrepancies between space-borne and ground-based lidar signals are partly explained by the strong spatial and vertical inhomogeneous distributions of clouds at few kilometer horizontal scales.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference13 articles.
1. Berthier, S., Chazette, P., Couvert, P., Pelon, J., Dulac, F., Thieuleux, F., Moulin, C., and Pain, T.: Desert dust aerosol columnar properties over ocean and continental Africa from Lidar in-Space Technology Experiment (LITE) and Meteosat synergy, J Geophys Res., 111, D21202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006999, 2006. 2. Kovacs, T. A., McCormick, M. P., Trepte, C. R., Winker, D. M., Garnier, A., and Pelon, J.: Coordination of quid pro quo ground-based measurements of cloud and aerosol optical properties for validation of the CALIPSO mission, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., 5653, 281–289, 2004. 3. Kovacs, T.: Comparing MODIS and AERONET aerosol optical depth at varying separation distances to assess ground-based validation strategies for spaceborne lidar, J Geophys Res., 111, D24203, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007349, 2006. 4. Liu, Z., Vaughan, M., Winker, D., Hostetler, C. A., Poole, L. R., Hlavka, D. L., Hart, W. D., and McGill, M. J.: Use of probability distribution functions for discriminating between cloud and aerosol in lidar backscatter data, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D15202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004732, 2004. 5. Liu, Z., Hu, Y., Vaughan, M., Reagan, J., Hostetler, C., Winker, D., Hunt, W., Powell, K., and Trepte, C.: Validation Of Calipso Lidar (CALIOP) Calibration. ILRC 2006, Nara, Japan, 2006.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|