Seismic background noise levels in the Italian strong-motion network
-
Published:2023-10-10
Issue:10
Volume:23
Page:3219-3234
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Fornasari Simone FrancescoORCID, Ertuncay DenizORCID, Costa GiovanniORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The Italian strong-motion network monitors the seismic activity in the region, with more than 585 stations with continuous data acquisition.
In this study, we determine the background seismic noise characteristics of the network by using the data collected in 2022.
We analyse the spatial and temporal characteristics of the background noise.
It is found that most of the stations suffer from anthropogenic noises, since the strong-motion network is designed to capture the peak ground motions in populated areas.
Hence, human activities enrich the low periods of noise.
Therefore, land usage of the area where the stations are located affects the background noise levels.
Stations can be noisier during the day, up to 12 dB, and during the weekday, up to 5 dB, in short periods.
In long periods (≥ 5 s), accelerometric stations converge to similar noise levels and there are no significant daily or weekly changes.
It is found that more than half of the stations exceed the background noise model designed for strong-motion stations in Switzerland by Cauzzi and Clinton (2013) in at least one of the calculated periods.
We also develop an accelerometric seismic background noise model for periods between 0.0124 and 100 s for Italy by using the power spectral densities of the network.
The model is in agreement with the background noise model developed by D’Alessandro et al. (2021) using broadband data for Italy in short periods, but in long periods there is no correlation among studies.
Funder
Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference41 articles.
1. Anthony, R. E., Ringler, A. T., Wilson, D. C., Bahavar, M., and Koper, K. D.:
How processing methodologies can distort and bias power spectral density
estimates of seismic background noise, Seismol. Res. Lett., 91,
1694–1706, 2020. a, b, c 2. Anthony, R. E., Ringler, A. T., and Wilson, D. C.: Seismic background noise
levels across the Continental United States from USArray transportable array:
The influence of geology and geography, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 112, 646–668, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k 3. Aucun, B., Fajfar, P., Franchin, P., Carvalho, E., Kreslin, M., Pecker, A.,
Tsionis, G., Pinto, P., Degee, H., Plumier, A., Fardis, M., Athanasopoulou,
A., Bisch, P., and Somja, H.: Eurocode 8 : seismic design of buildings –
Worked examples, Publications Office, https://doi.org/10.2788/91658, 2012. a 4. Bonnefoy-Claudet, S., Cornou, C., Bard, P.-Y., Cotton, F., Moczo, P., Kristek,
J., and Fäh, D.: H / V ratio: A tool for site effects evaluation. Results
from 1-D noise simulations, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 827–837,
2006. a, b, c, d 5. Brune, J. N.: Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from
earthquakes, Journal of Geophysical Research (1896–1977), 75, 4997–5009,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JB075i026p04997, 1970. a
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|