How uncertain are precipitation and peak flow estimates for the July 2021 flooding event?
-
Published:2023-01-17
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:159-177
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Saadi MohamedORCID, Furusho-Percot Carina, Belleflamme AlexandreORCID, Chen Ju-Yu, Trömel Silke, Kollet Stefan
Abstract
Abstract. The disastrous July 2021 flooding event made us question the ability of current hydrometeorological tools in providing timely and reliable flood forecasts for unprecedented events. This is an urgent concern since extreme events are increasing due to global warming, and existing methods are usually limited to more frequently observed events with the usual flood generation processes. For the July 2021 event, we simulated the hourly
streamflows of seven catchments located in western Germany by combining
seven partly polarimetric, radar-based quantitative precipitation estimates
(QPEs) with two hydrological models: a conceptual lumped model (GR4H) and a
physically based, 3D distributed model (ParFlowCLM). GR4H parameters were
calibrated with an emphasis on high flows using historical discharge
observations, whereas ParFlowCLM parameters were estimated based on
landscape and soil properties. The key results are as follows. (1) With no
correction of the vertical profiles of radar variables, radar-based QPE
products underestimated the total precipitation depth relative to rain
gauges due to intense collision–coalescence processes near the surface, i.e., below the height levels monitored by the radars. (2) Correcting the vertical profiles of radar variables led to substantial improvements. (3) The probability of exceeding the highest measured peak flow before July 2021 was highly impacted by the QPE product, and this impact depended on the catchment for both models. (4) The estimation of model parameters had a
larger impact than the choice of QPE product, but simulated peak flows of
ParFlowCLM agreed with those of GR4H for five of the seven catchments. This
study highlights the need for the correction of vertical profiles of
reflectivity and other polarimetric variables near the surface to improve
radar-based QPEs for extreme flooding events. It also underlines the large
uncertainty in peak flow estimates due to model parameter estimation.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference88 articles.
1. Anagnostou, M. N., Kalogiros, J., Anagnostou, E. N., Tarolli, M.,
Papadopoulos, A., and Borga, M.: Performance evaluation of high-resolution
rainfall estimation by X-band dual-polarization radar for flash flood
applications in mountainous basins, J. Hydrol., 394, 4–16,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.06.026, 2010. 2. Anagnostou, M. N., Nikolopoulos, E. I., Kalogiros, J., Anagnostou, E. N.,
Marra, F., Mair, E., Bertoldi, G., Tappeiner, U., and Borga, M.: Advancing
Precipitation Estimation and Streamflow Simulations in Complex Terrain with
X-Band Dual-Polarization Radar Observations, Remote Sens., 10, 1258,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081258, 2018. 3. Anctil, F. and Ramos, M.-H.: Verification Metrics for Hydrological Ensemble
Forecasts, in: Handbook of Hydrometeorological Ensemble Forecasting, edited
by: Duan, Q., Pappenberger, F., Thielen, J., Wood, A., Cloke, H. L., and
Schaake, J. C., Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1–30,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40457-3_3-1, 2017. 4. Anquetin, S., Yates, E., Ducrocq, V., Samouillan, S., Chancibault, K., Davolio, S., Accadia, C., Casaioli, M., Mariani, S., Ficca, G., Gozzini, B., Pasi, F., Pasqui, M., Garcia, A., Martorell, M., Romero, R., and Chessa, P.: The 8 and 9 September 2002 flash flood event in France: a model intercomparison, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 741–754, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-741-2005, 2005. 5. Asante, K. O., Artan, G. A., Pervez, M. S., Bandaragoda, C., and Verdin, J.
P.: Technical Manual for the Geospatial Stream Flow Model (GeoSFM),
Technical Manual for the Geospatial Stream Flow Model (GeoSFM), U.S.
Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2007-1441, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20071441, 2008.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|