Testing machine learning models for heuristic building damage assessment applied to the Italian Database of Observed Damage (DaDO)
-
Published:2023-10-05
Issue:10
Volume:23
Page:3199-3218
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Ghimire SubashORCID, Guéguen PhilippeORCID, Pothon Adrien, Schorlemmer Danijel
Abstract
Abstract. Assessing or forecasting seismic damage to buildings is an essential issue
for earthquake disaster management. In this study, we explore the efficacy
of several machine learning models for damage characterization, trained and
tested on the database of damage observed after Italian earthquakes (the Database of Observed Damage – DaDO).
Six models were considered: regression- and classification-based machine
learning models, each using random forest, gradient boosting, and extreme
gradient boosting. The structural features considered were divided into two
groups: all structural features provided by DaDO or only those considered to
be the most reliable and easiest to collect (age, number of storeys, floor
area, building height). Macroseismic intensity was also included as an input
feature. The seismic damage per building was determined according to the
EMS-98 scale observed after seven significant earthquakes occurring in
several Italian regions. The results showed that extreme gradient boosting
classification is statistically the most efficient method, particularly when
considering the basic structural features and grouping the damage according
to the traffic-light-based system used; for example, during the
post-disaster period (green, yellow, and red), 68 % of buildings were
correctly classified. The results obtained by the machine-learning-based
heuristic model for damage assessment are of the same order of accuracy
(error values were less than 17 %) as those obtained by the traditional
RISK-UE method. Finally, the machine learning analysis found that the
importance of structural features with respect to damage was conditioned by
the level of damage considered.
Funder
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions Agence Nationale de la Recherche AXA Research Fund
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference49 articles.
1. ATC: ATC-20-1, Field Manual: Postearthquake Safety Evaluation of Buildings
Second Edition, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, ISBN ATC20-1,
2005. 2. Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A. D., and Pekcan, G.: Data-driven structural health
monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: State-of-the-art
review, Sensors, 20, 2778, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102778, 2020. 3. Baggio, C., Bernardini, A., Colozza, R., Pinto, A. V., and Taucer, F.: Field
Manual for post-earthquake damage and safety assessment and short term
countermeasures (AeDES) Translation from Italian: Maria ROTA and Agostino
GORETTI, European Commission – Joint Research Centre – Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, EUR 22868, 2007. 4. Bazzurro, P., Cornell, C. A., Menun, C., and Motahari, M.: Guidelines for
seismic assessment of damaged buildings, in: 13th World Conference on
Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 74–76,
https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.38.1.41-49, 2004. 5. Branco, P., Ribeiro, R. P., Torgo, L., Krawczyk, B., and Moniz, N.: SMOGN: a
Pre-processing Approach for Imbalanced Regression, Proc. Mach. Learn. Res.,
74, 36–50, 2017.
|
|