The loess landscapes of the Lower Rhine Embayment as (geo-)archeological archives – insights and challenges from a geomorphological and sedimentological perspective
-
Published:2023-09-05
Issue:2
Volume:72
Page:203-218
-
ISSN:2199-9090
-
Container-title:E&G Quaternary Science Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:E&G Quaternary Sci. J.
Author:
Lehmkuhl FrankORCID, Schulte PhilippORCID, Römer Wolfgang, Pötter Stephan
Abstract
Abstract. Archeological and geoscientific research in loess landscapes remains
challenging due to erosional discordances and the relocation of sediments by
fluvial erosion and slope wash. The Lower Rhine Embayment (LRE) can serve as
a blueprint for archeological and paleoenvironmental research in loess
landscapes of Central Europe. The accumulation of wind-blown dust; paleosols
developed therein; and the archeological artifacts preserved in loess,
colluvial or alluvial sediments are evidence of the Pleistocene and Holocene
dynamics of the landscape. Geomorphologic processes in different
and specific relief positions must be considered different processes
that transform and relocate sediments and archeological remains. Besides aeolian
accumulation, erosion and deflation have also transformed the landscape of
the LRE. These include fluvial slope wash, gully formation, colluviation, and
periglacial processes such as solifluction, cryoturbation and the formation
of ice wedge pseudomorphs. In addition, other post-depositional processes,
including weathering and soil formation, modify the sedimentary record. In
light of the landscape evolution from more hilly landscapes to the flat,
agriculturally used terrain we see today, we highlight the relevance and
importance of different geomorphological and soil processes including their
impacts and challenges for archeological and geoscientific studies.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Archeology,Stratigraphy,Paleontology,Geology,Archeology
Reference83 articles.
1. Ahorner, L.: Untersuchungen zur quartären Bruchtektonik der Niederrheinischen Bucht, E&G Quaternary Sci. J., 13, 24–105, https://doi.org/10.3285/eg.13.1.04, 1962. 2. Andrieux, E., Bertran, P., and Saito, K.: Spatial analysis of the French
Pleistocene permafrost by a GIS database: French Pleistocene permafrost
database, Permafrost Periglac., 27, 17–30,
https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.1856, 2016. 3. Antoine, P., Rousseau, D.-D., Moine, O., Kunesch, S., Hatté, C., Lang,
A., Tissoux, H., and Zöller, L.: Rapid and cyclic aeolian deposition
during the Last Glacial in European loess: a high-resolution record from
Nussloch, Germany, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 28, 2955–2973,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.08.001, 2009. 4. Antoine, P., Rousseau, D.-D., Degeai, J.-P., Moine, O., Lagroix, F.,
Kreutzer, S., Fuchs, M., Hatté, C., Gauthier, C., Svoboda, J., and
Lisá, L.: High-resolution record of the environmental response to
climatic variations during the Last Interglacial–Glacial cycle in Central
Europe: the loess-palaeosol sequence of Dolní Věstonice (Czech
Republic), Quaternary Sci. Rev., 67, 17–38,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.01.014, 2013. 5. Antoine, P., Coutard, S., Guerin, G., Deschodt, L., Goval, E., Locht, J.-L.,
and Paris, C.: Upper Pleistocene loess-palaeosol records from Northern
France in the European context: Environmental background and dating of the
Middle Palaeolithic, Quaternary Int., 411, 4–24,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.036, 2016.
|
|