Constraining sector-specific CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in the US
-
Published:2017-03-24
Issue:6
Volume:17
Page:3963-3985
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Miller Scot M.,Michalak Anna M.
Abstract
Abstract. This review paper explores recent efforts to estimate state- and national-scale carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions from individual anthropogenic source sectors in the US. Nearly all state and national climate change regulations in the US target specific source sectors, and detailed monitoring of individual sectors presents a greater challenge than monitoring total emissions. We particularly focus on opportunities to synthesize disparate types of information on emissions, including emission inventory data and atmospheric greenhouse gas data.We find that inventory estimates of sector-specific CO2 emissions are sufficiently accurate for policy evaluation at the national scale but that uncertainties increase at state and local levels. CH4 emission inventories are highly uncertain for all source sectors at all spatial scales, in part because of the complex, spatially variable relationships between economic activity and CH4 emissions. In contrast to inventory estimates, top-down estimates use measurements of atmospheric mixing ratios to infer emissions at the surface; thus far, these efforts have had some success identifying urban CO2 emissions and have successfully identified sector-specific CH4 emissions in several opportunistic cases. We also describe a number of forward-looking opportunities that would aid efforts to estimate sector-specific emissions: fully combine existing top-down datasets, expand intensive aircraft measurement campaigns and measurements of secondary tracers, and improve the economic and demographic data (e.g., activity data) that drive emission inventories. These steps would better synthesize inventory and top-down data to support sector-specific emission reduction policies.
Funder
Carnegie Institution of Washington
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference151 articles.
1. Ackerman, K. V. and Sundquist, E. T.: Comparison of two US power-plant carbon dioxide emissions data sets, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 5688–5693, https://doi.org/10.1021/es800221q, 2008. 2. Air Resources Board: First update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA, available at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013_update/first_update_climate_change_scoping_plan.pdf (last access: 17 July 2016), 2014. 3. Alexe, M., Bergamaschi, P., Segers, A., Detmers, R., Butz, A., Hasekamp, O., Guerlet, S., Parker, R., Boesch, H., Frankenberg, C., Scheepmaker, R. A., Dlugokencky, E., Sweeney, C., Wofsy, S. C., and Kort, E. A.: Inverse modelling of CH4 emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from GOSAT and SCIAMACHY, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 113–133, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-113-2015, 2015. 4. Allen, D. T.: Methane emissions from natural gas production and use: reconciling bottom-up and top-down measurements, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 5, 78–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2014.05.004, 2014. 5. Allen, D. T., Pacsi, A. P., Sullivan, D. W., Zavala-Araiza, D., Harrison, M., Keen, K., Fraser, M. P., Hill, A. D., Sawyer, R. F., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Methane emissions from process equipment at natural gas production sites in the United States: pneumatic controllers, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 633–640, https://doi.org/10.1021/es5040156, 2015.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|