Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sites
-
Published:2016-02-08
Issue:2
Volume:9
Page:479-504
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Collalti A.ORCID, Marconi S., Ibrom A.ORCID, Trotta C.ORCID, Anav A., D'Andrea E., Matteucci G., Montagnani L.ORCID, Gielen B., Mammarella I.ORCID, Grünwald T.ORCID, Knohl A.ORCID, Berninger F., Zhao Y., Valentini R.ORCID, Santini M.
Abstract
Abstract. This study evaluates the performances of the new version (v.5.1) of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (FEM) in simulating gross primary productivity (GPP), against eddy covariance GPP data for 10 FLUXNET forest sites across Europe. A new carbon allocation module, coupled with new both phenological and autotrophic respiration schemes, was implemented in this new daily version. Model ability in reproducing timing and magnitude of daily and monthly GPP fluctuations is validated at intra-annual and inter-annual scale, including extreme anomalous seasons. With the purpose to test the 3D-CMCC FEM applicability over Europe without a site-related calibration, the model has been deliberately parametrized with a single set of species-specific parametrizations for each forest ecosystem. The model consistently reproduces both in timing and in magnitude daily and monthly GPP variability across all sites, with the exception of the two Mediterranean sites. We find that 3D-CMCC FEM tends to better simulate the timing of inter-annual anomalies than their magnitude within measurements' uncertainty. In six of eight sites where data are available, the model well reproduces the 2003 summer drought event. Finally, for three sites we evaluate whether a more accurate representation of forest structural characteristics (i.e. cohorts, forest layers) and species composition can improve model results. In two of the three sites results reveal that model slightly increases its performances although, statistically speaking, not in a relevant way.
Funder
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference157 articles.
1. Anav, A., D'Andrea, F., Viovy, N., and Vuichard, N.: A validation of
heat and carbon fluxes from high-resolution land surface and regional
models, J. Geophys. Res., 115, 1–20, 2010. 2. Arneth, A., Sitch, S., Bondeau, A., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Foster, P., Gedney,
N., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Prentice, I. C., Sanderson, M., Thonicke, K.,
Wania, R., and Zaehle, S.: From biota to chemistry and climate: towards a
comprehensive description of trace gas exchange between
the biosphere and atmosphere, Biogeosciences, 7, 121–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-121-2010,
2010. 3. Arora, V. K. and Boer, G. J.: A parameterization of leaf phenology
for the terrestrial ecosystem component of climate models, Glob. Change
Biol., 11, 39–59, 2005. 4. Aubinet, M., Grelle, A., Ibrom, A., Rannik, Ü., Moncrieff, J., Foken, T., Kowalski, A. S., Martin, P. H., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Clement, R., Elbers, J., Granier, A., Grönwald, T., Morgenstern, K., Pilegaard, K., Rebmann, C., Snijders,
W., Valentini, R., and Vesala, T.: Estimates of the annual net carbon
and water exchange of European forests: the EUROFLUX methodology, Adv. Ecol.
Res., 30, 113–175, 2000. 5. Bagnara, M., Van Oijen, M., Cameron, D., Gianelle, D., Magnani, F., and
Sottocornola, M.: A user-friendly forest model with a multiplicative
mathematical structure: a Bayesian approach to calibration, Geosci. Model
Dev. Discuss., 7, 6997–7031, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-7-6997-2014, 2014.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|