Supergene phases from ferruginous duricrusts: non-destructive microsampling and mineralogy prior to (U–Th) ∕ He geochronological analysis
-
Published:2023-06-14
Issue:3
Volume:35
Page:383-395
-
ISSN:1617-4011
-
Container-title:European Journal of Mineralogy
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur. J. Mineral.
Author:
Marques Karina P. P., Allard Thierry, Gautheron CécileORCID, Baptiste Benoît, Pinna-Jamme Rosella, Morin Guillaume, Delbes Ludovic, Vidal-Torrado Pablo
Abstract
Abstract. Interpreting the ages of supergene mineralogical phases in
laterite is complex because they consist of polycrystalline mixtures of
different phases at the microscopic scale that could be crystalized at
different epochs. Among the geochronometers, the (U-Th)/He method on
hematite and goethite is more often used, but ages can be difficult to interpret
due to phases mixing. To resolve this issue, this study proposes a
methodology for performing detailed mineralogical analysis of hematite and
goethite single grains prior to their dating using the (U-Th)/He method.
Strictly non-destructive mineralogy of single grains is not achievable by
classical tools, such as conventional powder XRD (X-ray diffraction; requiring at least some milligrams
of powder) or SEM (scanning electron microscopy; that can contaminate the grain by coating or fixing).
Therefore, we performed X-ray diffraction patterns of single grains using
high-flux X-ray beams from both a rotating anode (XRD_rotat)
laboratory diffractometer and a synchrotron beamline (XRD_synch) and compared the results in order to design a method based on
XRD_rotat only. For this purpose, two samples from the
pisolitic facies of a Brazilian ferruginous duricrust (Alto Paranaíba
region, Minas Gerais State, Brazil) were chosen because they presented a
usual heterogeneity. Rietveld refinements of the XRD patterns obtained from
both XRD_rotat and XRD_synch yielded similar
results for the weight percentage ratio of the main phases and mean coherent domain
sizes and less similar results for Al substitution rates, thus validating the
XRD_rotat approach. No beam damage was observed when
increasing X-ray exposure time, neither on XRD patterns nor on (U-Th)/He ages. Hence, sub-millimeter, undisturbed grains can be used to analyze the
mineralogy of ferruginous duricrusts by XRD_rotat with a
short exposure, and the same grains can subsequently be dated by (U-Th)/He geochronology analysis. The (U-Th)/He dating of pisolitic core and cortex
grains also provided meaningful ages: they revealed two evolution phases of
the ferruginous duricrust, which occurred at or before the Oligocene for
the pisolitic core and middle Miocene for the pisolitic cortex, agreeing with the
previous model for the development of pisolites. The mineralogy of single
grains selected for dating is helpful for discussing the crystallization
ages, and the high-flux XRD approach may be applied to other supergene
mineral parageneses used for absolute dating.
Funder
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference65 articles.
1. Aleva, G. J. J. (Ed.): Laterites: Concepts, Geology, Morphology and Chemistry,
International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen,
the Netherlands, 1994. 2. Allard, T., Gautheron, C., Riffel, S. B., Balan, E., Soares, B. F.,
Pinna-Jamme, R., Derycke, A., Morin G., Bueno, G. T., and Nascimento, N.:
Combined dating of goethites and kaolinites from ferruginous duricrusts.
Deciphering the Late Neogene erosion history of Central Amazonia, Chem.
Geol., 479, 136–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.01.004, 2018. 3. Ambrosi, J. P., Nahon, D., and Herbilon, A. J.: The epigenetic replacement of
kaolinite by hematite in laterite. Petrographic evidence and the mechanisms
involved, Geoderma, 37, 283–294,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(86)90030-3, 1986. 4. Amouric, M., Baronneta, A., Nahon, D., and Didier, P.: Electron microscopic
investigations of iron oxyhydroxides and accompanying phases in lateritic
iron-crust pisolites, Clay. Clay Miner., 34, 45–52, 1986. 5. Anand, R. R. and Gilkes, R. J.: Variations in the properties of iron oxides
within individual specimens of lateritic duricrust, Aust. J. Soil Res., 25,
287–302, https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9870287, 1987.
|
|