Modeling the high-mercury wet deposition in the southeastern US with WRF-GC-Hg v1.0
-
Published:2022-05-12
Issue:9
Volume:15
Page:3845-3859
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Xu XiaotianORCID, Feng XuORCID, Lin HaipengORCID, Zhang Peng, Huang Shaojian, Song Zhengcheng, Peng Yiming, Fu Tzung-MayORCID, Zhang Yanxu
Abstract
Abstract. High-mercury wet deposition in the southeastern United
States has been noticed for many years. Previous studies came up with a
theory that it was associated with high-altitude divalent mercury scavenged
by convective precipitation. Given the coarse resolution of previous models
(e.g., GEOS-Chem), this theory is still not fully tested. Here we employed a
newly developed WRF-GEOS-Chem (WRF-GC; WRF: Weather Research Forecasting) model implemented with mercury
simulation (WRF-GC-Hg v1.0). We conduct extensive model benchmarking by
comparing WRF-GC with different resolutions (from 50 to 25 km) to
GEOS-Chem output (4∘ × 5∘) and data from
the Mercury Deposition Network (MDN) in July–September 2013. The comparison of
mercury wet deposition from two models presents high-mercury wet
deposition in the southeastern United States. We divided simulation results
by heights (2, 4, 6, 8 km), different types of precipitation
(large-scale and convective), and combinations of these two variations
together and find most mercury wet deposition concentrates on higher level
and is caused by convective precipitation. Therefore, we conclude that it is
the deep convection that caused enhanced mercury wet deposition in the
southeastern United States.
Funder
National Key Research and Development Program of China Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference54 articles.
1. Ariya, P. A., Amyot, M., Dastoor, A., Deeds, D., Feinberg, A., Kos, G.,
Poulain, A., Ryjkov, A., Semeniuk, K., Subir, M., and Toyota, K.: Mercury
Physicochemical and Biogeochemical Transformation in the Atmosphere and at
Atmospheric Interfaces: A Review and Future Directions, Chem. Rev., 115,
3760–3802, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500667e, 2015. 2. Brisson, E., Van Weverberg, K., Demuzere, M., Devis, A., Saeed, S., Stengel,
M., and van Lipzig, N. P. M.: How well can a convection-permitting climate
model reproduce decadal statistics of precipitation, temperature and cloud
characteristics?, Clim. Dynam., 47, 3043–3061,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3012-z, 2016. 3. Bullock, O. R. and Brehme, K. A.: Atmospheric mercury simulation using the
CMAQ model: formulation description and analysis of wet deposition results,
Atmos. Environ., 36, 2135–2146,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00220-0, 2002. 4. Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model
with the Penn-State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part II: Preliminary model
validation, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 587–604,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0587:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2, 2001a. 5. Chen, F. and Dudhia, J.: Coupling and advanced land surface-hydrology model
with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation
and sensitivity, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 569–585,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2, 2001b.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|