Description and evaluation of the community aerosol dynamics model MAFOR v2.0
-
Published:2022-05-16
Issue:9
Volume:15
Page:3969-4026
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Karl Matthias, Pirjola Liisa, Grönholm Tiia, Kurppa Mona, Anand Srinivasan, Zhang Xiaole, Held Andreas, Sander RolfORCID, Dal Maso MiikkaORCID, Topping DavidORCID, Jiang Shuai, Kangas Leena, Kukkonen Jaakko
Abstract
Abstract. Numerical models are needed for evaluating aerosol processes in
the atmosphere in state-of-the-art chemical transport models,
urban-scale dispersion models, and climatic models.
This article describes a publicly available aerosol dynamics model,
MAFOR (Multicomponent Aerosol FORmation model; version 2.0);
we address the main structure of the model, including the types
of operation and the treatments of the aerosol processes.
The model simultaneously solves the time evolution of both the
particle number and the mass concentrations of aerosol components
in each size section. In this way, the model can also allow for
changes in the average density of particles.
An evaluation of the model is also presented against a
high-resolution observational dataset in a street canyon located
in the centre of Helsinki (Finland) during afternoon traffic
rush hour on 13 December 2010. The experimental data included
measurements at different locations in the street canyon of
ultrafine particles,
black carbon, and fine particulate
mass PM1.
This evaluation has also included an intercomparison with the
corresponding predictions of two other prominent aerosol dynamics
models, AEROFOR and SALSA.
All three models simulated the decrease in the measured
total particle number concentrations fairly well with increasing distance
from the vehicular emission source. The MAFOR model reproduced
the evolution of the observed particle number size distributions
more accurately than the other two models.
The MAFOR model also predicted the variation of the concentration
of PM1 better than the SALSA model.
We also analysed the relative importance of various aerosol
processes based on the predictions of the three models.
As expected, atmospheric dilution dominated over other processes;
dry deposition was the second most significant process.
Numerical sensitivity tests with the MAFOR model revealed that
the uncertainties associated with the properties of the condensing
organic vapours affected only the size range of particles smaller
than 10 nm in diameter.
These uncertainties therefore do not significantly affect the
predictions of the whole of the number size distribution and the
total number concentration. The MAFOR model version 2 is well
documented and versatile to use, providing a range of
alternative parameterizations for various aerosol processes.
The model includes an efficient numerical integration of particle
number and mass concentrations, an operator splitting of processes,
and the use of a fixed sectional method. The model could be used
as a module in various atmospheric and climatic models.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference205 articles.
1. Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation, 3. Sectional representation, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4026, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000483, 2002. a 2. Adams, P. J. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Predicting global aerosol size distributions in general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4370, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001010, 2002. a 3. Alam, M. K.: The effect of van der Waals and viscous forces on aerosol coagulation, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 6, 41–52, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828708959118, 1987. a 4. Alanen, J., Saukko, E., Lehtoranta, K., Murtonen, T., Timonen, H., Hillamo, R., Karjalainen, P., Kuuluvainen, H., Harra, J., Keskinen, J., and Rönkkö, T.: The formation and physical properties of the particle emissions from a natural gas engine, Fuel, 162, 155–161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.003, 2015. a, b 5. Anand, S. and Mayya, Y. S.: Coagulation in a diffusing Gaussian aerosol puff: Comparison of analytical approximations with numerical solutions, J.
Aerosol Sci., 40, 348–361, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.12.004, 2009. a
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|