A comparison of Jason-2 plasmasphere electron content measurements with ground-based measurements
-
Published:2023-06-20
Issue:1
Volume:41
Page:269-280
-
ISSN:1432-0576
-
Container-title:Annales Geophysicae
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann. Geophys.
Author:
Mazzella Jr. Andrew J.,Yizengaw Endawoke
Abstract
Abstract. Previous studies utilizing the Global Positioning System
(GPS) receivers aboard Jason satellites have performed measurements of
plasmasphere electron content (PEC) by determining the total electron
content (TEC) above these satellites, which are at altitudes of about 1340 km. This study uses similar methods to determine PEC for the Jason-2
receiver for 24 July 2011. These PEC values are compared to previous
determinations of PEC from a chain of ground-based GPS receivers in Africa
using the SCORPION method, with a nominal ionosphere–plasmasphere boundary
at 1000 km. The Jason-2 PECs with elevations greater than 60∘
were converted to equivalent vertical PEC and compared to SCORPION vertical
PEC determinations. In addition, slant (off-vertical) PECs from Jason-2
were compared to a small set of nearly co-aligned ground-based slant PECs.
The latter comparison avoids any conversion of Jason-2 slant PEC to
equivalent vertical PEC, and it can be considered a more representative
comparison. The mean difference between the vertical PEC (ground-based
minus Jason-2 measurements) values is 0.82 ± 0.28 TEC units (1 TEC unit=1016 electrons m−2). Similarly, the mean difference
between slant PEC values is 0.168 ± 0.924 TEC units. The Jason-2 slant
PEC comparison method may provide a reliable determination for the
plasmasphere baseline value for the ground-based receivers, especially if
the ground stations are confined to only midlatitude or low-latitude
regions, which can be affected by a non-negligible PEC baseline.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Geology,Astronomy and Astrophysics
Reference31 articles.
1. Andreasen, A. M., Holland, E. A., Fremouw, E. J., Mazzella, A. J., Rao, G. S., and Secan, J. A.: Investigations of the nature and behavior of plasma-density disturbances that may impact GPS and other transionospheric systems, AFRL-VS-TR-2003-1540, Air Force Res. Lab., Hanscom Air Force Base, Mass., https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA417708.pdf (last access: 25 April 2023), 2002. 2. Anghel, A., Carrano, C., Komjathy, A., Astilean, A., and Letia, T.: Kalman filter-based algorithms for monitoring the ionosphere and plasmasphere with GPS in near-real time, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 71, 158–174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.10.006, 2009. 3. Bishop, G., Walsh, D., Daly, P., Mazzella, A., and Holland, E.: Analysis of the temporal stability of GPS and GLONASS group delay correction terms seen in various sets of ionospheric delay data, Rep. ION GPS-94, Inst. of Navig., Washington, D. C., https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=3988 (last access: 1 May 2023), 1994. 4. Carrano, C. S., Anghel, A., Quinn, R. A., and Groves, K. M.: Kalman filter estimation of plasmaspheric total electron content using GPS, Radio Sci., 44, RS0A10, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RS004070, 2009. 5. Daniell, R. E., Brown, L. D., Anderson, D. N., Fox, M. W., Doherty, P. H., Decker, D. T., Sojka, J. J., and Schunk, R. W.: PIM: A global ionospheric parameterization based on first principles models, Radio Sci., 30, 1499–1510, https://doi.org/10.1029/95RS01826, 1995.
|
|