Updated trends of the stratospheric ozone vertical distribution in the 60° S–60° N latitude range based on the LOTUS regression model
-
Published:2022-09-09
Issue:17
Volume:22
Page:11657-11673
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Godin-Beekmann SophieORCID, Azouz Niramson, Sofieva Viktoria F.ORCID, Hubert DaanORCID, Petropavlovskikh IrinaORCID, Effertz Peter, Ancellet GérardORCID, Degenstein Doug A., Zawada Daniel, Froidevaux Lucien, Frith Stacey, Wild Jeannette, Davis SeanORCID, Steinbrecht WolfgangORCID, Leblanc Thierry, Querel RichardORCID, Tourpali Kleareti, Damadeo Robert, Maillard Barras ElianeORCID, Stübi René, Vigouroux Corinne, Arosio CarloORCID, Nedoluha Gerald, Boyd Ian, Van Malderen RoelandORCID, Mahieu EmmanuelORCID, Smale DanORCID, Sussmann Ralf
Abstract
Abstract. This study presents an updated evaluation of stratospheric ozone profile
trends in the 60∘ S–60∘ N latitude range over the
2000–2020 period using an updated version of the Long-term Ozone Trends
and Uncertainties in the Stratosphere (LOTUS) regression model that was used
to evaluate such trends up to 2016 for the last WMO Ozone Assessment (2018).
In addition to the derivation of detailed trends as a function of latitude
and vertical coordinates, the regressions are performed with the datasets
averaged over broad latitude bands, i.e. 60–35∘ S,
20∘ S–20∘ N and 35–60∘ N. The
same methodology as in the last assessment is applied to combine trends in
these broad latitude bands in order to compare the results with the previous
studies. Longitudinally resolved merged satellite records are also
considered in order to provide a better comparison with trends retrieved
from ground-based records, e.g. lidar, ozonesondes, Umkehr, microwave and
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers at selected stations where
long-term time series are available. The study includes a comparison with
trends derived from the REF-C2 simulations of the Chemistry Climate Model
Initiative (CCMI-1). This work confirms past results showing an ozone
increase in the upper stratosphere, which is now significant in the three
broad latitude bands. The increase is largest in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere midlatitudes, with ∼2.2 ± 0.7 % per decade at
∼2.1 hPa and ∼2.1 ± 0.6 % per decade at
∼3.2 hPa respectively compared to ∼1.6 ± 0.6 % per decade at ∼2.6 hPa in the tropics. New trend
signals have emerged from the records, such as a significant decrease in
ozone in the tropics around 35 hPa and a non-significant increase in ozone
in the southern midlatitudes at about 20 hPa. Non-significant negative
ozone trends are derived in the lowermost stratosphere, with the most
pronounced trends in the tropics. While a very good agreement is obtained
between trends from merged satellite records and the CCMI-1 REF-C2
simulation in the upper stratosphere, observed negative trends in the lower
stratosphere are not reproduced by models at southern and, in particular, at
northern midlatitudes, where models report an ozone increase. However, the
lower-stratospheric trend uncertainties are quite large, for both measured
and modelled trends. Finally, 2000–2020 stratospheric ozone trends derived
from the ground-based and longitudinally resolved satellite records are in
reasonable agreement over the European Alpine and tropical regions, while at
the Lauder station in the Southern Hemisphere midlatitudes they show some
differences.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference41 articles.
1. Arosio, C., Rozanov, A., Malinina, E., Weber, M., and Burrows, J. P.: Merging of ozone profiles from SCIAMACHY, OMPS and SAGE II observations to study stratospheric ozone changes, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2423–2444, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2423-2019, 2019. 2. Ball, W. T., Alsing, J., Mortlock, D. J., Staehelin, J., Haigh, J. D., Peter, T., Tummon, F., Stübi, R., Stenke, A., Anderson, J., Bourassa, A., Davis, S. M., Degenstein, D., Frith, S., Froidevaux, L., Roth, C., Sofieva, V., Wang, R., Wild, J., Yu, P., Ziemke, J. R., and Rozanov, E. V.: Evidence for a continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1379–1394, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1379-2018, 2018. 3. Ball, W. T., Chiodo, G., Abalos, M., Alsing, J., and Stenke, A.: Inconsistencies between chemistry–climate models and observed lower stratospheric ozone trends since 1998, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9737–9752, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9737-2020, 2020. 4. Bernet, L., von Clarmann, T., Godin-Beekmann, S., Ancellet, G., Maillard Barras, E., Stübi, R., Steinbrecht, W., Kämpfer, N., and Hocke, K.: Ground-based ozone profiles over central Europe: incorporating anomalous observations into the analysis of stratospheric ozone trends, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4289–4309, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4289-2019, 2019. 5. Bourassa, A. E., Roth, C. Z., Zawada, D. J., Rieger, L. A., McLinden, C. A., and Degenstein, D. A.: Drift-corrected Odin-OSIRIS ozone product: algorithm and updated stratospheric ozone trends, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 489–498, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-489-2018, 2018.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|