Examining the implications of photochemical indicators for O3–NOx–VOC sensitivity and control strategies: a case study in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China
-
Published:2022-11-22
Issue:22
Volume:22
Page:14799-14811
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Li Xun, Qin MomeiORCID, Li Lin, Gong Kangjia, Shen HuizhongORCID, Li JingyiORCID, Hu Jianlin
Abstract
Abstract. Ozone (O3) has become a significant air pollutant in China in
recent years. O3 abatement is challenging due to the nonlinear response
of O3 to precursors nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). Photochemical indicators are widely used to estimate the
O3–NOx–VOC sensitivity, and this has important policy
implications. However, the effectiveness of the indicators has seldom been
evaluated. This study examined the applications of four indicators that
include the ratio of the production rates of H2O2 and HNO3
(PH2O2/PHNO3), HCHO/NO2, HCHO/NOy, and reactive nitrogen
(NOy) in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) with localized thresholds. The
overall accuracy was high (>92 %) for all indicators and not
significantly reduced with different simulation periods or in different
locations of the region. By comparing with the O3 isopleths, it was
found that HCHO/NO2 and HCHO/NOy showed the most consistency,
whereas PH2O2/PHNO3 (NOy) tended to underestimate
(overestimate) the positive response of O3 to NOx. Additionally,
PH2O2/PHNO3 was less likely to attribute the O3 formation to
mixed sensitivity than the other indicators, and this demonstrated a
preference for a single-pollutant control strategy. This study also revealed
that the details in the methodology used to derive the threshold values
impacted the results, and this may produce uncertainties in the application
of photochemical indicators.
Funder
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference56 articles.
1. An, J., Huang, Y., Huang, C., Wang, X., Yan, R., Wang, Q., Wang, H., Jing, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, Y., Xu, C., Qiao, L., Zhou, M., Zhu, S., Hu, Q., Lu, J., and Chen, C.: Emission inventory of air pollutants and chemical speciation for specific anthropogenic sources based on local measurements in the Yangtze River Delta region, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 2003–2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2003-2021, 2021. 2. Castell, N., Stein, A. F., Mantilla, E., Salvador, R., and Millán, M.:
Evaluation of the use of photochemical indicators to assess
ozone-NOx-VOC sensitivity in the Southwestern Iberian Peninsula, J.
Atmos. Chem., 63, 73–91,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-010-9158-x, 2009. 3. Chen, X., Jiang, Z., Shen, Y., Li, R., Fu, Y., Liu, J., Han, H., Liao, H.,
Cheng, X., and Jones, D. B.: Chinese regulations are working-why is surface
ozone over industrialized areas still high? Applying lessons from northeast
US air quality evolution, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL092816,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092816, 2021. 4. Cohan, D. S., Hakami, A., Hu, Y., and Russell, A. G.: Nonlinear response of
ozone to emissions: Source apportionment and sensitivity analysis, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 39, 6739–6748,
https://doi.org/10.1021/es048664m, 2005. 5. De Marco, A., Garcia-Gomez, H., Collalti, A., Khaniabadi, Y. O., Feng, Z.,
Proietti, C., Sicard, P., Vitale, M., Anav, A., and Paoletti, E.: Ozone
modelling and mapping for risk assessment: An overview of different
approaches for human and ecosystems health, Environ. Res., 211, 113048,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113048, 2022.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|