Evaluation of optimized flux chamber design for measurement of ammonia emission after field application of slurry with full-scale farm machinery
-
Published:2024-07-29
Issue:14
Volume:17
Page:4493-4505
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Pedersen JohannaORCID, Hafner Sasha D., Pacholski AndreasORCID, Karlsson Valthor I., Rong Li, Labouriau Rodrigo, Kamp Jesper N.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Field-applied liquid animal manure (slurry) is a significant source of ammonia (NH3) emission, which is harmful to the environment and human health. To evaluate mitigation options, reliable emission measurement methods are needed. A new system of dynamic flux chambers (DFCs) with high-temporal-resolution online measurements was developed. The system was investigated in silico with computational fluid dynamics and tested using three respective field trials, with each trial assessing the variability in the measured emission after application with trailing hose at different scales: manual (handheld) application, a 3 m experimental slurry boom, and a 30 m farm-scale commercial slurry boom. For the experiments with machine application, parallel NH3 emission measurements were made using an inverse dispersion modeling method (backward Lagrangian stochastic, bLS, modeling). The lowest coefficient of variation among replicate DFC measurements was obtained with manual application (5 %), followed by the 3 m slurry boom (14 %), and lastly the 30 m slurry boom (20 %). Conditions in DFCs resulted in a consistently higher NH3 flux than that measured with the inverse dispersion technique, but both methods showed a similar emission reduction by injection compared with the trailing hose: 89 % by DFC and 97 % by bLS modeling. The new measurement system facilitates NH3 emission measurement with replication after both manual and farm-scale slurry application with relatively high precision.
Funder
Ministeriet for Fø devarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference50 articles.
1. American Public Health Association: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn., edited by: Clescerl, L. S., Greenberg, A. E., and Aeaton, A. D., American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington DC, 1999. 2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Official methods of analysis of AOAC international, 16th edn., edited by: Cunniff, P., AOAC, Arlington, USA, 1999. 3. Beltran, I., van der Weerden, T. J., Alfaro, M. A., Amon, B., de Klein, C. A. M., Grace, P., Hafner, S., Hassouna, M., Hutchings, N., Krol, D. J., Leytem, A. B., Noble, A., Salazar, F., Thorman, R. E., and Velthof, G. L.: DATAMAN: A global database of nitrous oxide and ammonia emission factors for excreta deposited by livestock and land-applied manure, J. Environ. Qual., 50, 513–527, https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20186, 2021. 4. Bühler, M., Häni, C., Ammann, C., Mohn, J., Neftel, A., Schrade, S., Zähner, M., Zeyer, K., Brönnimann, S., and Kupper, T.: Assessment of the inverse dispersion method for the determination of methane emissions from a dairy housing, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 307, 108501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108501, 2021. 5. Davison, A. C. Hinkley, D. V.: Bootstrap Methods and their Application, Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802843, 1997.
|
|