Author:
Rabiei E.,Haberlandt U.,Sester M.,Fitzner D.
Abstract
Abstract. The spatial assessment of short time-step precipitation is a challenging task. Low density of observation networks, as well as the bias in radar rainfall estimation motivated the new idea of exploiting cars as moving rain gauges with windshield wipers or optical sensors as measurement devices. In a preliminary study, this idea has been tested with computer experiments (Haberlandt and Sester, 2010). The results have shown that a high number of possibly inaccurate measurement devices (moving cars) provide more reliable areal rainfall estimations than a lower number of precise measurement devices (stationary gauges). Instead of assuming a relationship between wiper frequency (W) and rainfall intensity (R) with an arbitrary error, the main objective of this study is to derive valid W–R relationships between sensor readings and rainfall intensity by laboratory experiments. Sensor readings involve the wiper speed, as well as optical sensors which can be placed on cars and are usually made for automating wiper activities. A rain simulator with the capability of producing a wide range of rainfall intensities is designed and constructed. The wiper speed and two optical sensors are used in the laboratory to measure rainfall intensities, and compare it with tipping bucket readings as reference. Furthermore, the effect of the car speed on the estimation of rainfall using a car speed simulator device is investigated. The results show that the sensor readings, which are observed from manual wiper speed adjustment according to the front visibility, can be considered as a strong indicator for rainfall intensity, while the automatic wiper adjustment show weaker performance. Also the sensor readings from optical sensors showed promising results toward measuring rainfall rate. It is observed that the car speed has a significant effect on the rainfall measurement. This effect is highly dependent on the rain type as well as the windshield angle.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference28 articles.
1. Bocci, F.: Whether or not to run in the rain, Eur. J. Phys., 33, 1321, https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/33/5/1321, 2012.
2. Chandrasekar, V., Chen, H., and Maki, M.: Urban flash flood applications of high-resolution rainfall estimation by X-band dual-polarization radar network, Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere, Clouds, and Precipitation IV, Proc. SPIE, Kyoto, Japan, 8523, 85230K, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.977602, 2012.
3. Ciach, G. J.: Local Random Errors in Tipping-Bucket Rain Gauge Measurements, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 20, 752–759, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)202.0.co;2, 2003.
4. de Jong, S.: Low cost disdrometer, Master thesis report, TU Delft, Delft, the Netherlands, 2010.
5. Diop, M. and Grimes, D. I. F.: Satellite-based rainfall estimation for river flow forecasting in Africa, II: African Easterly Waves, convection and rainfall, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 48, 585–599, 2003.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献