Identifying the optimal spatial distribution of tracers for optical sensing of stream surface flow
-
Published:2020-11-09
Issue:11
Volume:24
Page:5173-5185
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Pizarro AlonsoORCID, Dal Sasso Silvano F., Perks Matthew T.ORCID, Manfreda SalvatoreORCID
Abstract
Abstract. River monitoring is of particular interest as a society that faces increasingly complex water management issues. Emerging technologies have contributed to opening new avenues for improving our monitoring capabilities but have also generated new challenges for the harmonised use of devices and algorithms. In this context, optical-sensing techniques for stream surface flow velocities are strongly influenced by tracer characteristics such as seeding density and their spatial distribution. Therefore, a principal research goal is the identification of how these properties affect the accuracy of such methods. To this aim, numerical simulations were performed to consider different levels of tracer clustering, particle colour (in terms of greyscale intensity), seeding
density, and background noise. Two widely used image-velocimetry algorithms
were adopted: (i) particle-tracking velocimetry (PTV) and (ii) particle image velocimetry (PIV). A descriptor of the seeding characteristics (based on seeding density and tracer clustering) was introduced based on a newly developed metric called the Seeding Distribution Index (SDI). This index can be approximated and used in practice as SDI=ν0.1/ρρcν1, where ν, ρ, and ρcν1 are the spatial-clustering level, the seeding density, and the reference seeding density at ν=1, respectively. A reduction in image-velocimetry errors was systematically observed for lower values of the SDI; therefore, the optimal
frame window (i.e. a subset of the video image sequence) was defined as the
one that minimises the SDI. In addition to numerical analyses, a field case
study on the Basento river (located in southern Italy) was considered as a
proof of concept of the proposed framework. Field results corroborated
numerical findings, and error reductions of about 15.9 % and 16.1 % were calculated – using PTV and PIV, respectively – by employing the optimal frame window.
Funder
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference52 articles.
1. Adrian, R.: Particle-Imaging Techniques For Experimental Fluid-Mechanics, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 23, 261–304, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.23.1.261, 1991. 2. Adrian, R. J.: Twenty years of particle image velocimetry, Exp. Fluids, 39, 159–169, 2005. 3. Anderson, K. E., Paul, A. J., McCauley, E., Jackson, L. J., Post, J. R., and
Nisbet, R. M.: Instream flow needs in streams and rivers: The importance of
understanding ecological dynamics, Front. Ecol. Environ., 4, 309–318,
https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[309:IFNISA]2.0.CO;2, 2006. 4. Batalla, R. J. and Vericat, D.: Hydrological and sediment transport dynamics
of flushing flows: Implications for management in large Mediterranean rivers, River Res. Appl., 25, 297–314, https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1160, 2009. 5. Bechle, A., Wu Chin, H., Liu, W.-C., and Kimura, N.: Development and Application of an Automated River-Estuary Discharge Imaging System, J.
Hydraul. Eng., 138, 327–339, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000521, 2012.
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|