Evaluation of the ERA5 reanalysis as a potential reference dataset for hydrological modelling over North America
-
Published:2020-05-14
Issue:5
Volume:24
Page:2527-2544
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Tarek Mostafa, Brissette François P.ORCID, Arsenault RichardORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
(ECMWF) recently released its most advanced reanalysis product, the ERA5
dataset. It was designed and generated with methods giving it multiple
advantages over the previous release, the ERA-Interim reanalysis product.
Notably, it has a finer spatial resolution, is archived at the hourly time
step, uses a more advanced assimilation system and includes more sources of
data. This paper aims to evaluate the ERA5 reanalysis as a potential
reference dataset for hydrological modelling by considering the ERA5
precipitation and temperatures as proxies for observations in the
hydrological modelling process, using two lumped hydrological models over
3138 North American catchments. This study shows that ERA5-based
hydrological modelling performance is equivalent to using observations over
most of North America, with the exception of the eastern half of the US,
where observations lead to consistently better performance. ERA5 temperature
and precipitation biases are consistently reduced compared to ERA-Interim
and systematically more accurate for hydrological modelling. Differences
between ERA5, ERA-Interim and observation datasets are mostly linked to
precipitation, as temperature only marginally influences the hydrological
simulation outcomes.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference64 articles.
1. Albergel, C., Dutra, E., Munier, S., Calvet, J.-C., Munoz-Sabater, J., de Rosnay, P., and Balsamo, G.: ERA-5 and ERA-Interim driven ISBA land surface model simulations: which one performs better?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3515–3532, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3515-2018, 2018. 2. Arsenault, R., Poulin, A., Côté, P., and Brissette, F.: Comparison
of stochastic optimization algorithms in hydrological model
calibration, J. Hydrol. Eng., 19, 1374–1384, 2013. 3. Arsenault, R., Gatien, P., Renaud, B., Brissette, F., and Martel, J. L.: A
comparative analysis of 9 multi-model averaging approaches in hydrological
continuous streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 529, 754–767, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.001, 2015. 4. Arsenault, R., Bazile, R., Ouellet Dallaire, C., and Brissette, F.: CANOPEX: A Canadian hydrometeorological
watershed database, Hydrol. Process., 30, 2734–2736, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10880, 2016 (data available at: http://canopex.etsmtl.net/, last access: December, 2010). 5. Arsenault, R., Brissette, F., and Martel, J.-L.: The hazards of split-sample
validation in hydrological model calibration, J. Hydrol., 566,
346–362, 2018.
Cited by
360 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|