A data-based predictive model for spatiotemporal variability in stream water quality
-
Published:2020-02-24
Issue:2
Volume:24
Page:827-847
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Guo DanluORCID, Lintern Anna, Webb J. Angus, Ryu DongryeolORCID, Bende-Michl Ulrike, Liu ShuciORCID, Western Andrew WilliamORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Our current capacity to model stream water quality is limited – particularly
at large spatial scales across multiple catchments. To address this, we
developed a Bayesian hierarchical statistical model to simulate the
spatiotemporal variability in stream water quality across the state of
Victoria, Australia. The model was developed using monthly water quality
monitoring data over 21 years and across 102 catchments (which span over
130 000 km2). The modeling focused on six key water quality
constituents: total suspended solids (TSS), total phosphorus (TP),
filterable reactive phosphorus (FRP), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN),
nitrate–nitrite (NOx) and electrical conductivity (EC). The model
structure was informed by knowledge of the key factors driving water quality
variation, which were identified in two preceding studies using the same
dataset. Apart from FRP, which is hardly explained (19.9 %), the model
explains 38.2 % (NOx) to 88.6 % (EC) of the total spatiotemporal
variability in water quality. Across constituents, the model generally
captures over half of the observed spatial variability; the temporal variability
remains largely unexplained across all catchments, although long-term trends
are well captured. The model is best used to predict proportional changes in
water quality on a Box–Cox-transformed scale, but it can have substantial bias
if used to predict absolute values for high concentrations. This model can
assist catchment management by (1) identifying hot spots and hot moments for
waterway pollution; (2) predicting the effects of catchment changes on water
quality, e.g., urbanization or forestation; and (3) identifying and explaining
major water quality trends and changes. Further model improvements should
focus on the following: (1) alternative statistical model structures to improve fitting
for truncated data (for constituents where a large amount of data fall below the
detection limit); and (2) better representation of nonconservative
constituents (e.g., FRP) by accounting for important biogeochemical
processes.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference100 articles.
1. Abbaspour, K. C., Rouholahnejad, E., Vaghefi, S., Srinivasan, R., Yang, H.,
and Kløve, B.: A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for
Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT
model, J. Hydrol., 524, 733–752,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027, 2015. 2. Adams, R., Arafat, Y., Eate, V., Grace, M. R., Saffarpour, S., Weatherley,
A. J., and Western, A. W.: A catchment study of sources and sinks of
nutrients and sediments in south-east Australia, J. Hydrol., 515,
166–179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.034, 2014. 3. Ahearn, D. S., Sheibley, R. W., Dahlgren, R. A., and Keller, K. E.: Temporal
dynamics of stream water chemistry in the last free-flowing river draining
the western Sierra Nevada, California, J. Hydrol., 295, 47–63,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.02.016, 2004. 4. Ai, L., Shi, Z. H., Yin, W., and Huang, X.: Spatial and seasonal patterns in
stream water contamination across mountainous watersheds: Linkage with
landscape characteristics, J. Hydrol., 523, 398–408,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.082, 2015. 5. Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE
T. Automat. Contr., 19, 716–723, 1974.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|