Monthly Gridded Data Product of Northern Wetland Methane
Emissions Based on Upscaling Eddy Covariance Observations
Author:
Peltola OlliORCID, Vesala Timo, Gao YaoORCID, Räty Olle, Alekseychik PavelORCID, Aurela MikaORCID, Chojnicki Bogdan, Desai Ankur R.ORCID, Dolman Albertus J.ORCID, Euskirchen Eugenie S.ORCID, Friborg ThomasORCID, Göckede MathiasORCID, Helbig Manuel, Humphreys Elyn, Jackson Robert B.ORCID, Jocher Georg, Joos FortunatORCID, Klatt Janina, Knox Sara H.ORCID, Kutzbach LarsORCID, Lienert SebastianORCID, Lohila AnnaleaORCID, Mammarella Ivan, Nadeau Daniel F., Nilsson Mats B., Oechel Walter C., Peichl MatthiasORCID, Pypker Thomas, Quinton William, Rinne JanneORCID, Sachs TorstenORCID, Samson MateuszORCID, Schmid Hans Peter, Sonnentag Oliver, Wille ChristianORCID, Zona DonatellaORCID, Aalto TuulaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Natural wetlands constitute the largest and most uncertain source of methane (CH4) to the atmosphere and a large fraction of them are in the northern latitudes. These emissions are typically estimated using process (bottom-up) or inversion (top-down) models, yet the two are not independent of each other since the top-down estimates rely on the a priori estimation of these emissions coming from the process models. Hence, independent validation data of the large-scale emissions would be needed. Here we utilize random forest (RF) machine learning technique to upscale CH4 eddy covariance flux measurements from 25 sites to estimate CH4 wetland emissions from the northern latitudes (north of 45 °N) during years 2013 and 2014. The predictive performance of the RF model is evaluated using the leave-one-site-out cross-validation scheme and the performance (Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency = 0.47) is comparable to previous studies upscaling net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide or studies where process models are compared against site-level CH4 emission data. Three wetland maps are utilized in the upscaling and the annual emissions for the northern wetlands yield 31.7 (22.3–41.2, 95 % confidence interval), 30.6 (21.4–39.9) or 37.6 (25.9–49.5) Tg(CH4) yr−1, depending on the map used. To evaluate the uncertainties of the upscaled product it is also compared against two process models (LPX-Bern and WetCHARTs) and methodological issues related to CH4 flux upscaling are discussed. The monthly upscaled CH4 flux data product is available for further usage at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2560164.
Funder
Academy of Finland Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Helmholtz Association Horizon 2020 Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|