Abstract
Abstract. This work aims at providing an updated scenario on the underrepresentation
of women in the Italian university system in the area of geosciences in the
last two decades. The retrieved official data on permanent full and
associate professors in the 19-years considered highlight some positive
trends: an increase in the number of female full professors from 9.0 % to
18.5 % and in female associate professors from 23.6 % to 28.9 %.
However, although the number of female full professors almost doubled in
this period, such increase still represents an excessively slow trend.
Slightly better is the trend related to associate professors. The picture
portrayed for non-permanent researchers, called RTD-b, as introduced by the
Italian Law no. 240/2010 (essentially tenure-track associate professor
position), instead raises strong concerns for the future seen that the
female percentage is just 26 %, thus exhibiting a significant gender
imbalance. This is even more significant if we consider that the student
population in geosciences shows a gender imbalance of about 37 %, no
gender gap at PhD level and a relatively high Glass Ceiling Index (GCI)
during the career progression of women. An analysis of the geographical distribution of female researchers in
geosciences has evidenced that, although the percentages of women are
comparable, the GCI calculated in Southern Italy has been alarmingly high in the last 2–3 years and is divergent from the decrease observed in Northern and Central Italy. The work also analyses the gender balance over different areas of geosciences, showing that in Paleontology and Paleoecology the gap is
inverted with more female than male professors, both at full and associate
professor level, whereas the gap is almost closed in Mineralogy for
associate professors, far though from being balanced for full professors.
All remaining geological disciplines suffer a gender imbalance. Further analysis carried out in this work unveils that the number of female
full professor is low (<10 %) both at national and regional level in the 2000–2009 decade, consistent with a GCI higher than 2.5–3. From 2010
to 2013, likely in response to the Italian Law no. 240 of 2010, an important progressive increase, associated with a decrease of GCI, is visible. However, from 2014 to 2019 the percentage remains constant (∼20 %) with the exception of Southern Italy, which displays a return to lower values (<15 %). Finally, an international comparison with countries like Germany and the USA definitively indicates that the Italian university system is more equal in terms of gender balance. Even if some significant and positive steps have been carried out in the
Italian university system, still much effort is required to fight a general
and crucial problem which is the gender balance issue. Results could be
achieved promoting work-life balance policies that better reconcile family
and work, stimulating a reorganization of the work system still currently
set on the male model but, and more importantly, changing the prevailing
patriarchal mentality. The Italian university system has already a great example to follow: the
zero-pay gap. This is possibly the only system worldwide where male and
female professors earn the same identical salary, compared to the salary gap of between 15 % and 30 % of countries richer than Italy, and must be the target to reach, in the near future, for gender balance.
Funder
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
European Research Council
Reference28 articles.
1. Alma Laurea – Consorzio interuniversitario Almalaurea, available at: https://www.almalaurea.it/, last access: 28 November 2019.
2. Barone, C.: Some things never change: gender segregation in higher education across eight nations and three decades, Sociol. Educ., 84, 157–176, 2011.
3. Broome, J.: The Future of Geoscience in the 21st Century: Art, Science, or
Resource?, in: The Current Role of Geological Mapping in Geosciences. NATO Science Series, Series IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences, vol. 56, edited by: Ostaficzuk, S. R., Springer, Dordrecht, 2005.
4. Burke, R. J. and Mattis, M. C.: Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Upping the numbers, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, England, 2007.
5. Ceci, S. J. and Williams, W. M.: Understanding current causes of women's
underrepresentation in science, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 3157–3162, 2011.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献