Geothermal heat flux is the dominant source of uncertainty in englacial-temperature-based dating of ice rise formation
-
Published:2023-01-16
Issue:1
Volume:17
Page:195-210
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Montelli Aleksandr, Kingslake JonathanORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Ice rises are areas of locally grounded, slow-moving ice adjacent
to floating ice shelves. Temperature profiles measured through ice rises
contain information regarding changes to their dynamic evolution and
external forcings, such as past surface temperatures, past accumulation
rates and geothermal heat flux. While previous work has used borehole
temperature–depth measurements to infer one or two such parameters, there
has been no systematic investigation of parameter sensitivity to the
interplay of multiple external forcings and dynamic changes. A
one-dimensional vertical heat flow forward model developed here examines how
changing forcings affect temperature profiles. Further, using both synthetic
data and previous measurements from the Crary Ice Rise in Antarctica, we use
our model in a Markov chain Monte Carlo inversion to demonstrate that this
method has potential as a useful dating technique that can be implemented at
ice rises across Antarctica. However, we also highlight the non-uniqueness
of previous ice rise formation dating based on temperature profiles, showing
that using nominal values for forcing parameters, without taking into
account their realistic uncertainties, can lead to underestimation of dating
uncertainty. In particular, geothermal heat flux represents the dominant
source of uncertainty in ice rise age estimation. For instance, in Crary Ice
Rise higher heat flux values (i.e. about 90 mW m−2) yield grounding
timing of 1400 ± 800 years, whereas lower heat flux of around 60 mW m−2 implies earlier ice rise formation and lower uncertainties in the
ice rise age estimations (500 ± 250 years). We discuss the utility of
this method in choosing future ice drilling sites and conclude that
integrating this technique with other indirect dating methods can provide
useful constraints on past forcings and changing boundary conditions from
in situ temperature–depth measurements.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology
Reference60 articles.
1. Agosta, C., Amory, C., Kittel, C., Orsi, A., Favier, V., Gallée, H., van den Broeke, M. R., Lenaerts, J. T. M., van Wessem, J. M., van de Berg, W. J., and Fettweis, X.: Estimation of the Antarctic surface mass balance using the regional climate model MAR (1979–2015) and identification of dominant processes, The Cryosphere, 13, 281–296, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-281-2019, 2019. 2. Albrecht, T., Winkelmann, R., and Levermann, A.: Glacial-cycle simulations of the Antarctic Ice Sheet with the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM) – Part 1: Boundary conditions and climatic forcing, The Cryosphere, 14, 599–632, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-599-2020, 2020a. 3. Albrecht, T., Winkelmann, R., and Levermann, A.: Glacial-cycle simulations of the Antarctic Ice Sheet with the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM) – Part 2: Parameter ensemble analysis, The Cryosphere, 14, 633–656, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-633-2020, 2020b. 4. Alley, R. B. and Koci, B. R.: Recent warming in central Greenland?, Ann.
Glaciol., 14, 6–8, 1990. 5. An, M. J., Wiens, D. A., Zhao, Y., Feng, M., Nyblade, A., Kanao, M. L., Li,
Y., Maggi, A., and Lévêque, J.: Temperature, lithosphere-asthenosphere
boundary, and heat flux beneath the Antarctic Plate inferred from seismic
velocities, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 8720–8742,
2015.
|
|