Isoprene suppression of new particle formation in a mixed deciduous forest
-
Published:2011-06-24
Issue:12
Volume:11
Page:6013-6027
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Kanawade V. P.,Jobson B. T.,Guenther A. B.,Erupe M. E.,Pressley S. N.,Tripathi S. N.,Lee S.-H.
Abstract
Abstract. Production of new particles over forests is an important source of cloud condensation nuclei that can affect climate. While such particle formation events have been widely observed, their formation mechanisms over forests are poorly understood. Our observations made in a mixed deciduous forest with large isoprene emissions during the summer displayed a surprisingly rare occurrence of new particle formation (NPF). Typically, NPF events occur around noon but no NPF events were observed during the 5 weeks of measurements. The exceptions were two evening ultrafine particle events. During the day, sulfuric acid concentrations were in the 106 cm−3 range with very low preexisting aerosol particles, a favorable condition for NPF to occur even during the summer. The ratio of emitted isoprene carbon to monoterpene carbon at this site was similar to that in Amazon rainforests (ratio >10), where NPF events are also very rare, compared with a ratio <0.5 in Finland boreal forests, where NPF events are frequent. Our results suggest that large isoprene emissions can suppress NPF formation in forests although the underlying mechanism for the suppression is unclear. The two evening ultrafine particle events were associated with the transported anthropogenic sulfur plumes and ultrafine particles were likely formed via ion-induced nucleation. Changes in landcover and environmental conditions could modify the isoprene suppression of NPF in some forest regions resulting in a radiative forcing that could have influence on the climate.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference104 articles.
1. Andreae, M. O. and Andreae, T. W.: The cycle of biogenic sulfur-compounds over the Amazon basin: 1. Dry season, J. Geohpys. Res., 93(D2), 1487–1497, 1988. 2. Apel, E. C., Riemer, D. D., Hills, A., Baugh, W., Orlando, J., Faloona, I., Tan, D., Brune, W., Lamb, B., Westberg, H., Carroll, M. A., Thornberry, T., and Geron, C. D.: Measurement and interpretation of isoprene fluxes and isoprene, methacrolein, and methyl vinyl ketone mixing ratios at the prophet site during the 1998 intensive, J. Geohpys. Res., 107(D3), https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000225, 2002. 3. Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., and Troe, J.: Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume II – gas phase reactions of organic species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3625–4055, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3625-2006, 2006. 4. Ball, S. M., Hanson, D. R., Eisele, F. L., and McMurry, P. H.: Laboratory studies of particle nucleation: Initial results for H2SO4, H2O, and NH3 vapors, J. Geophys. Res., 104(D19), 23709–237180, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900411, 1999. 5. Barket Jr., D., Hurst, J., Couch, T., Colorado, A., Shepson, P., Riemer, D., Hills, A., Apel, E., Hafer, R., Lamb, B., Westbersg, H., Farmer, C., Stabenau, E., and Zika, R.: Intercomparison of automated methodologies for determination of ambient isoprene during the prophet 1998 summer campaign, J. Geohpys. Res., 106(D20), 24301–24313, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900562, 2001.
Cited by
74 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|