Validation of the TOLNet lidars: the Southern California Ozone Observation Project (SCOOP)
-
Published:2018-11-12
Issue:11
Volume:11
Page:6137-6162
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Leblanc Thierry, Brewer Mark A., Wang Patrick S., Granados-Muñoz Maria JoseORCID, Strawbridge Kevin B., Travis Michael, Firanski Bernard, Sullivan John T.ORCID, McGee Thomas J., Sumnicht Grant K., Twigg Laurence W., Berkoff Timothy A., Carrion William, Gronoff GuillaumeORCID, Aknan Ali, Chen Gao, Alvarez Raul J., Langford Andrew O., Senff Christoph J., Kirgis Guillaume, Johnson Matthew S., Kuang Shi, Newchurch Michael J.
Abstract
Abstract. The North America-based Tropospheric Ozone Lidar Network (TOLNet)
was recently established to provide high spatiotemporal vertical profiles of
ozone, to better understand physical processes driving tropospheric ozone
variability and to validate the tropospheric ozone measurements of upcoming
spaceborne missions such as Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring Pollution
(TEMPO). The network currently comprises six tropospheric ozone lidars, four
of which are mobile instruments deploying to the field a few times per year,
based on campaign and science needs. In August 2016, all four mobile TOLNet
lidars were brought to the fixed TOLNet site of JPL Table Mountain Facility
for the 1-week-long Southern California Ozone Observation Project (SCOOP).
This intercomparison campaign, which included 400 h of lidar measurements
and 18 ozonesonde launches, allowed for the unprecedented simultaneous
validation of five of the six TOLNet lidars. For measurements between 3 and
10 km a.s.l., a mean difference of 0.7 ppbv (1.7 %), with a
root-mean-square deviation of 1.6 ppbv or 2.4 %, was found between the
lidars and ozonesondes, which is well within the combined uncertainties of
the two measurement techniques. The few minor differences identified were
typically associated with the known limitations of the lidars at the profile
altitude extremes (i.e., first 1 km above ground and at the instruments'
highest retrievable altitude). As part of a large homogenization and quality
control effort within the network, many aspects of the TOLNet in-house data
processing algorithms were also standardized and validated. This thorough
validation of both the measurements and retrievals builds confidence as to the
high quality and reliability of the TOLNet ozone lidar profiles for many
years to come, making TOLNet a valuable ground-based reference network for
tropospheric ozone profiling.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference44 articles.
1. Alvarez, R. J., Senff, C. J., Langford, A. O., Weickmann, A. M., Law, D. C.,
Machol, J. L., Merritt, D. A., Marchbanks, R. D., Sandberg, S. P., Brewer,
W. A., Hardesty, R. M., and Banta, R. M.: Development and Application of a
Compact, Tunable, Solid-State Airborne Ozone Lidar System for Boundary Layer
Profiling, J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 28, 1258–1272,
https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-10-05044.1, 2011. 2. Browell, E. V., Ismail, S., and Shipley, S. T.: Ultraviolet DIAL
measurements of O3 profiles in regions of spatially inhomogeneous aerosols,
Appl. Opt., 24, 2827–2836, https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.24.002827, 1985. 3. Cooper, O. R., Gao, R. S., Tarasick, D., Leblanc, T., and Sweeney, C.:
Long-term ozone trends at rural ozone monitoring sites across the United
States, 1990–2010, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D22307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018261,
2012. 4. Daumont, D., Brion, J., Charbonnier, J., and Malicet, J.: Ozone UV
Spectroscopy I: Absorption Cross-Sections at Room Temperature, J. Atmos
Chem., 15, 145–155, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00053756, 1992. 5. De Mazière, M., Thompson, A. M., Kurylo, M. J., Wild, J. D., Bernhard,
G., Blumenstock, T., Braathen, G. O., Hannigan, J. W., Lambert, J.-C.,
Leblanc, T., McGee, T. J., Nedoluha, G., Petropavlovskikh, I., Seckmeyer, G.,
Simon, P. C., Steinbrecht, W., and Strahan, S. E.: The Network for the
Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC): history, status and
perspectives, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4935–4964,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4935-2018, 2018.
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|