Methane emissions due to reservoir flushing: a significant emission pathway?
-
Published:2023-10-04
Issue:19
Volume:20
Page:4057-4068
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Lessmann OleORCID, Encinas Fernández Jorge, Martínez-Cruz Karla, Peeters Frank
Abstract
Abstract. Reservoirs represent a globally significant source of the
greenhouse gas methane (CH4), which is emitted via different emission
pathways. In some reservoirs, reservoir flushing is employed as a sediment
management strategy to counteract growing sediment deposits that threaten
reservoir capacity. Reservoir flushing utilizes the eroding force of water
currents during water level drawdown to mobilize and transport sediment
deposits through the dam outlet into the downstream river. During this
process, CH4 that is stored in the sediment can be released into the
water and degas to the atmosphere, resulting in CH4 emissions. Here, we
assess the significance of this CH4 emission pathway and compare it to
other CH4 emission pathways from reservoirs. We measured seasonal and
spatial CH4 concentrations in the sediment of Schwarzenbach Reservoir,
providing one of the largest datasets on CH4 pore water concentrations
in freshwater systems. Based on this dataset we determined CH4 fluxes
from the sediment and estimated potential CH4 emissions due to
reservoir flushing. CH4 emissions due to one flushing operation can
constitute 7 %–14 % of the typical annual CH4 emissions from
Schwarzenbach Reservoir, whereby the amount of released CH4 depends on
the seasonal timing of the flushing operation and can differ by a factor of 2. Larger flushing events that mobilize deeper sediment layers lead to
non-linear increases in CH4 mobilization. This suggests that regular
flushing of smaller sediment layers releases less CH4 than removal of
the same sediment volume in fewer flushing events of thicker sediment
layers. However, additional indirect CH4 emissions pathways
contributing to the total CH4 emissions may vary with the flushing
operation. In other reservoirs with higher sediment loadings than
Schwarzenbach Reservoir, reservoir flushing could cause substantial CH4
emissions, especially when flushing operations are conducted frequently. Our
study recognizes CH4 emissions due to reservoir flushing as an
important pathway, identifies potential management strategies to mitigate
these CH4 emissions and emphasizes the need for further research.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference64 articles.
1. Almeida, R. M., Hamilton, S. K., Rosi, E. J., Barros, N., Doria, C. R. C., Flecker, A. S., Fleischmann, A. S., Reisinger, A. J., and Roland, F.: Hydropeaking Operations of Two Run-of-River Mega-Dams Alter Downstream Hydrology of the Largest Amazon Tributary, Front. Environ. Sci., 8, 120, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00120, 2020. 2. Antoine, G., Camenen, B., Jodeau, M., Némery, J., and Esteves, M.: Downstream erosion and deposition dynamics of fine suspended sediments due to dam flushing, J. Hydrol., 585, 124763, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124763, 2020. 3. Bastviken, D., Ejlertsson, J., and Tranvik, L.: Measurement of methane oxidation in lakes: A comparison of methods, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 3354–3361, https://doi.org/10.1021/es010311p, 2002. 4. Bastviken, D., Cole, J., Pace, M., and Tranvik, L.: Methane emissions from lakes: Dependence of lake characteristics, two regional assessments, and a global estimate, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002238, 2004. 5. Bastviken, D., Tranvik, L. J., Downing, J. A., Crill, P. M., and Enrich-Prast, A.: Freshwater Methane Emissions Offset the Continental Carbon Sink, Science, 331, 50, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196808, 2011.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|