An overview of measurement comparisons from the INTEX-B/MILAGRO airborne field campaign
-
Published:2011-01-11
Issue:1
Volume:4
Page:9-27
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Kleb M. M.,Chen G.,Crawford J. H.,Flocke F. M.,Brown C. C.
Abstract
Abstract. As part of the NASA's INTEX-B mission, the NASA DC-8 and NSF C-130 conducted three wing-tip to wing-tip comparison flights. The intercomparison flights sampled a variety of atmospheric conditions (polluted urban, non-polluted, marine boundary layer, clean and polluted free troposphere). These comparisons form a basis to establish data consistency, but also should also be viewed as a continuation of efforts aiming to better understand and reduce measurement differences as identified in earlier field intercomparison exercises. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of 140 intercomparisons of data collected as well as a record of the measurement consistency demonstrated during INTEX-B. It is the primary goal to provide necessary information for the future research to determine if the observations from different INTEX-B platforms/instrument are consistent within the PI reported uncertainties and used in integrated analysis. This paper may also contribute to the formulation strategy for future instrument developments. For interpretation and most effective use of these results, the reader is strongly urged to consult with the instrument principle investigator.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference18 articles.
1. Bahreini, R., Evans, B., Middlebrook,A. M., Warneke, C., de Gouw, J. A., De Carlo, P. F., Jimenez, J. L., Brock, C. A., Neuman, J. A., Ryerson, T. B., Stark, H., Atlas, E., Brioude, J., Fried, A., Holloway, J. S., Peischl, J., Richter, D., Walega, J., Weibring, P., Wollny, A. G., and Fehsenfeld, F. C.: Organic aerosol formation in urban and industrial plumes near Houston and Dallas, Texas, J. Geophys. Res., 114, DF00F16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011493, 2009. 2. Beck, S. M., Bendura, R. J., McDougal, D. S., Hoell, J. M., Gregory, G. L., Curfman, H. J., Davis, D. D., Bradshaw, J., Rodgers, M. O., Wang, C. C., Davis, L. I., Campbell, M. J., Torres, A. L., Carroll, M. A., Ridley, B. A., Sachse, G. W., Hill, G. F., Condon, E. P., and Rasmussen, R. A.: Operational Overview of NASA GTE/CITE 1 Airborne Instrument Intercomparisons: Carbon Monoxide, Nitric Oxide, and Hydroxyl Instrumentation, J. Geophys. Res, 92, 1977–1985, 1987. 3. Boggs, P. T., Spiegelman, C. H., Donaldson, J. R., and Schnabel, R. B.: A computational examination of orthogonal distance regression, J. Econometr., 38, 169–201, 1988. 4. DeCarlo, P. F., Dunlea, E. J., Kimmel, J. R., Aiken, A. C., Sueper, D., Crounse, J., Wennberg, P. O., Emmons, L., Shinozuka, Y., Clarke, A., Zhou, J., Tomlinson, J., Collins, D. R., Knapp, D., Weinheimer, A. J., Montzka, D. D., Campos, T., and Jimenez, J. L.: Fast airborne aerosol size and chemistry measurements above Mexico City and Central Mexico during the MILAGRO campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4027–4048, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4027-2008, 2008. 5. Dunlea, E. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Aiken, A. C., Kimmel, J. R., Peltier, R. E., Weber, R. J., Tomlinson, J., Collins, D. R., Shinozuka, Y., McNaughton, C. S., Howell, S. G., Clarke, A. D., Emmons, L. K., Apel, E. C., Pfister, G. G., van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Millet, D. B., Heald, C. L., and Jimenez, J. L.: Evolution of Asian aerosols during transpacific transport in INTEX-B, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7257–7287, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7257-2009, 2009.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|