The impact of melt ponds on summertime microwave brightness temperatures and
sea-ice concentrations
-
Published:2016-09-26
Issue:5
Volume:10
Page:2217-2239
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Kern Stefan, Rösel Anja, Pedersen Leif ToudalORCID, Ivanova Natalia, Saldo Roberto, Tonboe Rasmus Tage
Abstract
Abstract. Sea-ice concentrations derived from satellite microwave brightness temperatures are less accurate during summer. In the Arctic Ocean the lack of accuracy is primarily caused by melt ponds, but also by changes in the properties of snow and the sea-ice surface itself. We investigate the sensitivity of eight sea-ice concentration retrieval algorithms to melt ponds by comparing sea-ice concentration with the melt-pond fraction. We derive gridded daily sea-ice concentrations from microwave brightness temperatures of summer 2009. We derive the daily fraction of melt ponds, open water between ice floes, and the ice-surface fraction from contemporary Moderate Resolution Spectroradiometer (MODIS) reflectance data. We only use grid cells where the MODIS sea-ice concentration, which is the melt-pond fraction plus the ice-surface fraction, exceeds 90 %. For one group of algorithms, e.g., Bristol and Comiso bootstrap frequency mode (Bootstrap_f), sea-ice concentrations are linearly related to the MODIS melt-pond fraction quite clearly after June. For other algorithms, e.g., Near90GHz and Comiso bootstrap polarization mode (Bootstrap_p), this relationship is weaker and develops later in summer. We attribute the variation of the sensitivity to the melt-pond fraction across the algorithms to a different sensitivity of the brightness temperatures to snow-property variations. We find an underestimation of the sea-ice concentration by between 14 % (Bootstrap_f) and 26 % (Bootstrap_p) for 100 % sea ice with a melt-pond fraction of 40 %. The underestimation reduces to 0 % for a melt-pond fraction of 20 %. In presence of real open water between ice floes, the sea-ice concentration is overestimated by between 26 % (Bootstrap_f) and 14 % (Bootstrap_p) at 60 % sea-ice concentration and by 20 % across all algorithms at 80 % sea-ice concentration. None of the algorithms investigated performs best based on our investigation of data from summer 2009. We suggest that those algorithms which are more sensitive to melt ponds could be optimized more easily because the influence of unknown snow and sea-ice surface property variations is less pronounced.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology
Reference68 articles.
1. Andersen, S., Tonboe, R. T., Kaleschke, L., Heygster, G., and Pedersen, L. T.: Intercomparison of passive microwave sea ice concentration retrievals over the high-concentration Arctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 112, C08004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003543, 2007. 2. Ashcroft, P. and Wentz, F. J.: AMSR-E/Aqua L2A global swath spatially-resampled brightness temperatures data set, version 3, [2009-06-01 to 2009-08-31], NASA DAAC at the National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, Colorado, USA, https://doi.org/10.5067/AMSR-E/AE_L2A.003, 2013. 3. Baum, B. A., Menzel, W. P., Frey, R. A., Tobin, D. C., Holz, R. E., and Ackerman, S. A.: MODIS cloud-top property refinement for Collection 6, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51, 1145–1163, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0203.1, 2012. 4. Beitsch, A.: Uncertainties of a near 90 GHz sea ice concentration retrieval algorithm. Dissertationsschrift, Universität Hamburg, available at: http://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/volltexte/2014/7070/pdf/Dissertation.pdf, last access: 2 June 2016, 2014. 5. Cavalieri, D. J., Gloersen, P., and Campbell, W. J.: Determination of sea ice parameters with the NIMBUS 7 SMMR, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 5355–5369, 1984.
Cited by
51 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|