Swinging motion of a kite with suspended control unit flying turning manoeuvres
-
Published:2024-06-14
Issue:6
Volume:9
Page:1323-1344
-
ISSN:2366-7451
-
Container-title:Wind Energy Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Wind Energ. Sci.
Author:
Schelbergen Mark, Schmehl RolandORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The flexible-membrane kite employed by some airborne wind energy systems uses a suspended control unit, which experiences a characteristic swinging motion relative to the top of the kite during sharp turning manoeuvres. This paper assesses the accuracy of a two-point kite model in resolving this swinging motion using two different approaches: approximating the motion as a transition through steady-rotation states and solving the motion dynamically. The kite is modelled with two rigidly linked point masses representing the control unit and wing, which conveniently extend a discretised tether model. The tether-kite motion is solved by prescribing the trajectory of the wing point mass to replicate a figure-eight manoeuvre from the flight data of an existing prototype. The computed pitch and roll of the kite are compared against the attitude measurements of two sensors mounted to the wing. The two approaches compute similar pitch and roll angles during the straight sections of the figure-eight manoeuvre and match measurements within 3°. However, during the turns, the dynamically solved pitch and roll angles show systematic differences compared to the steady-rotation solution. As a two-point kite model resolves the roll, the lift force may tilt along with the kite, which is identified as the driving mechanism for turning flexible kites. Moreover, the two-point kite model complements the aerodynamic model as it allows for computing the angle of attack of the wing by resolving the pitch. These characteristics improve the generalisation of the kite model compared to a single-point model with little additional computational effort.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference29 articles.
1. Andersson, J. A. E., Gillis, J., Horn, G., Rawlings, J. B., and Diehl, M.: CasADi – A software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control, Mathematical Programming Computation, 11, 1–36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12532-018-0139-4, 2019. a 2. Borobia, R., Sanchez-Arriaga, G., Serino, A., and Schmehl, R.: Flight-Path Reconstruction and Flight Test of Four-Line Power Kites, J. Guid. Control, 41, 2604–2614, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003581, 2018. a 3. Bosch, A., Schmehl, R., Tiso, P., and Rixen, D.: Nonlinear Aeroelasticity, Flight Dynamics and Control of a Flexible Membrane Traction Kite, in: Airborne Wind Energy, edited by: Ahrens, U., Diehl, M., and Schmehl, R., Green Energy and Technology, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Chap. 17, 307–323, ISBN 978-3-642-39964-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39965-7_17, 2013. a 4. Breukels, J., Schmehl, R., and Ockels, W.: Aeroelastic Simulation of Flexible Membrane Wings based on Multibody System Dynamics, in: Airborne Wind Energy, edited by: Ahrens, U., Diehl, M., and Schmehl, R., Green Energy and Technology, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Chap. 16, 287–305, ISBN 978-3-642-39964-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39965-7_16, 2013. a 5. Cayon, O., Gaunaa, M., and Schmehl, R.: Fast Aero-Structural Model of a Leading-Edge Inflatable Kite, Energies, 16, 3061, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073061, 2023. a
|
|