An actuator sector model for wind power applications: a parametric study
-
Published:2024-06-10
Issue:6
Volume:9
Page:1305-1321
-
ISSN:2366-7451
-
Container-title:Wind Energy Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Wind Energ. Sci.
Author:
Mohammadi Mohammad Mehdi, Olivares-Espinosa HugoORCID, Navarro Diaz Gonzalo Pablo, Ivanell Stefan
Abstract
Abstract. This paper investigates different actuator sector model implementation alternatives and how they compare to actuator line results. The velocity sampling method, tip/smearing correction, and time step are considered. A good agreement is seen between the line and sector model in the rotor plane and the wake flow. Using the sector model, it was possible to reduce the computational time by 75 % compared to the actuator line model as it is possible to run the simulations with a larger time step without compromising the accuracy considerably. The results suggest that the proposed velocity sampling method produces the closest results to the line model with different tip speed ratios. Moreover, the vortex-based smearing correction applied to the sector model results in the lowest error values, among the considered methods, to correct the radial load distributions. Also, it is seen that reducing the time step compared to the one used for the actuator disc/sector does not provide an advantage considering the increased computational time.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference33 articles.
1. Asmuth, H., Navarro Diaz, G. P., Madsen, H. A., Branlard, E., Meyer Forsting, A. R., Nilsson, K., Jonkman, J., and Ivanell, S.: Wind Turbine Response in Waked Inflow: A Modelling Benchmark Against Full-Scale Measurements, SSRN Electron. J., 191, 868–887, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3940154, 2021. a, b 2. Churchfield, M., Lee, S., Moriarty, P., Martinez, L., Leonardi, S., Vijayakumar, G., and Brasseur, J.: A Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind-Plant Aerodynamics, in: 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nashville, Tennessee, ISBN 9781600869365, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-537, 2012. a, b 3. Churchfield, M. J., Schreck, S. J., Martinez, L. A., Meneveau, C., and Spalart, P. R.: An Advanced Actuator Line Method for Wind Energy Applications and Beyond, in: 35th Wind Energy Symposium, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Grapevine, Texas, ISBN 9781624104565, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-1998, 2017. a 4. Dağ, K. O. and Sørensen, J. N.: A new tip correction for actuator line computations, Wind Energy, 23, 148–160, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2419, 2020. a 5. Fleming, P., Gebraad, P. M., Lee, S., Van Wingerden, J.-W., Johnson, K., Churchfield, M., Michalakes, J., Spalart, P., and Moriarty, P.: Simulation comparison of wake mitigation control strategies for a two-turbine case: Simulation comparison of wake mitigation control strategies for a two-turbine case, Wind Energy, 18, 2135–2143, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1810, 2015. a
|
|