Evaluation of the CloudSat surface snowfall product over Antarctica using ground-based precipitation radars
-
Published:2018-11-30
Issue:12
Volume:12
Page:3775-3789
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Souverijns NielsORCID, Gossart AlexandraORCID, Lhermitte StefORCID, Gorodetskaya Irina V.ORCID, Grazioli JacopoORCID, Berne Alexis, Duran-Alarcon Claudio, Boudevillain BriceORCID, Genthon Christophe, Scarchilli Claudio, van Lipzig Nicole P. M.
Abstract
Abstract. In situ observations of snowfall over the Antarctic Ice Sheet are scarce.
Currently, continent-wide assessments of snowfall are limited to information
from the Cloud Profiling Radar on board the CloudSat satellite, which has not been evaluated up to now. In this study,
snowfall derived from CloudSat is evaluated using three ground-based
vertically profiling 24 GHz precipitation radars (Micro Rain Radars: MRRs).
Firstly, using the MRR long-term measurement records, an assessment of the
uncertainty caused by the low temporal sampling rate of CloudSat (one revisit
per 2.1 to 4.5 days) is performed. The 10–90th-percentile temporal sampling
uncertainty in the snowfall climatology varies between 30 % and 40 %
depending on the latitudinal location and revisit time of CloudSat. Secondly,
an evaluation of the snowfall climatology indicates that the CloudSat
product, derived at a resolution of 1∘ latitude by 2∘
longitude, is able to accurately represent the snowfall climatology at the
three MRR sites (biases < 15 %), outperforming ERA-Interim. For coarser
and finer resolutions, the performance drops as a result of higher omission
errors by CloudSat. Moreover, the CloudSat product does not perform well in
simulating individual snowfall events. Since the difference between the MRRs
and the CloudSat climatology are limited and the temporal uncertainty is
lower than current Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5)
snowfall variability, our results imply that the CloudSat product is valuable
for climate model evaluation purposes.
Funder
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology
Reference56 articles.
1. Boening, C., Lebsock, M., Landerer, F., and Stephens, G.: Snowfall-driven mass
change on the East Antarctic ice sheet, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L21501,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053316, 2012. a 2. Berne, A., Grazioli, J., and Genthon, C.: Precipitation observations at the
Dumont D'Urville station, Adelie Land, East Antarctica, PANGAEA,
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.882565, 2017. a 3. Bromwich, D. H., Guo, Z., Bai, L., and Chen, Q.-S.: Modeled Antarctic
Precipitation. Part I: Spatial and Temporal Variability, J. Climate, 17,
427–447, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0427:MAPPIS>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a 4. Bromwich, D. H., Nicolas, J. P., and Monaghan, A. J.: An Assessment of
Precipitation Changes over Antarctica and the Southern Ocean since 1989 in
Contemporary Global Reanalyses, J. Climate, 24, 4189–4209, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4074.1, 2011. a, b, c 5. Carrasco, J. F., Bromwich, D. H., and Monaghan, A. J.: Distribution and
Characteristics of Mesoscale Cyclones in the Antarctic: Ross Sea Eastward to
the Weddell Sea, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 289–301, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0289:DACOMC>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a, b
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|