Large-sample hydrology: a need to balance depth with breadth
-
Published:2014-02-06
Issue:2
Volume:18
Page:463-477
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Gupta H. V., Perrin C., Blöschl G., Montanari A.ORCID, Kumar R.ORCID, Clark M., Andréassian V.
Abstract
Abstract. A holy grail of hydrology is to understand catchment processes well enough that models can provide detailed simulations across a variety of hydrologic settings at multiple spatiotemporal scales, and under changing environmental conditions. Clearly, this cannot be achieved only through intensive place-based investigation at a small number of heavily instrumented catchments, or by empirical methods that do not fully exploit our understanding of hydrology. In this opinion paper, we discuss the need to actively promote and pursue the use of a "large catchment sample" approach to modeling the rainfall–runoff process, thereby balancing depth with breadth. We examine the history of such investigations, discuss the benefits (improved process understanding resulting in robustness of prediction at ungauged locations and under change), examine some practical challenges to implementation and, finally, provide perspectives on issues that need to be taken into account as we move forward. Ultimately, our objective is to provoke further discussion and participation, and to promote a potentially important theme for the upcoming Scientific Decade of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences entitled Panta Rhei.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference140 articles.
1. Abdulla, F. A., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Development of regional parameter estimation equations for a macroscale hydrologic model, J. Hydrol., 197, 230–257, 1997. 2. Andréassian, V., Hall, A., Chahinian, N., and Schaake, J.: Introduction and Synthesis: Why should hydrologists work on a large number of basin data sets?, in: IAHS Publication no. 307, Large sample basin experiments for hydrological model parameterization: Results of the Model Parameter Experiment – MOPEX, Paris, 1–5, 2006. 3. Andréassian, V., Lerat, J., Loumagne, C., Mathevet, T., Michel, C., Oudin, L., and Perrin, C.: What is really undermining hydrologic science today?, Hydrol. Process., 21, 2819–2822, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6854, 2007. 4. Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Berthet, L., Le Moine, N., Lerat, J., Loumagne, C., Oudin, L., Mathevet, T., Ramos, M.-H., and Valéry, A.: HESS Opinions "Crash tests for a standardized evaluation of hydrological models", Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1757–1764, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1757-2009, 2009. 5. Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Parent, E., and Bardossy, A.: Editorial – The Court of Miracles of Hydrology: can failure stories contribute to hydrological science?, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 55, 849–856, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2010.506050, 2010.
Cited by
213 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|