Generation of global 1 km daily soil moisture product from 2000 to 2020 using ensemble learning
-
Published:2023-05-23
Issue:5
Volume:15
Page:2055-2079
-
ISSN:1866-3516
-
Container-title:Earth System Science Data
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Syst. Sci. Data
Author:
Zhang Yufang, Liang ShunlinORCID, Ma Han, He TaoORCID, Wang QianORCID, Li Bing, Xu JiangleiORCID, Zhang GuodongORCID, Liu XiaobangORCID, Xiong Changhao
Abstract
Abstract. Motivated by the lack of long-term global soil moisture products
with both high spatial and temporal resolutions, a global 1 km daily
spatiotemporally continuous soil moisture product (GLASS SM) was generated
from 2000 to 2020 using an ensemble learning model (eXtreme Gradient
Boosting – XGBoost). The model was developed by integrating multiple
datasets, including albedo, land surface temperature, and leaf area index
products from the Global Land Surface Satellite (GLASS) product suite, as
well as the European reanalysis (ERA5-Land) soil moisture product, in situ
soil moisture dataset from the International Soil Moisture Network (ISMN),
and auxiliary datasets (Multi-Error-Removed Improved-Terrain (MERIT) DEM and
Global gridded soil information (SoilGrids)). Given the relatively large-scale differences between point-scale
in situ measurements and other datasets, the triple collocation (TC) method
was adopted to select the representative soil moisture stations and their
measurements for creating the training samples. To fully evaluate the model
performance, three validation strategies were explored: random,
site independent, and year independent. Results showed that although the
XGBoost model achieved the highest accuracy on the random test samples, it
was clearly a result of model overfitting. Meanwhile, training the model
with representative stations selected by the TC method could considerably
improve its performance for site- or year-independent test samples. The
overall validation accuracy of the model trained using representative
stations on the site-independent test samples, which was least likely to be
overfitted, was a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and root mean square
error (RMSE) of 0.079 m3 m−3. Moreover, compared to the model
developed without station filtering, the validation accuracies of the model
trained with representative stations improved significantly for most stations,
with the median R and unbiased RMSE (ubRMSE) of the model for each station
increasing from 0.64 to 0.74 and decreasing from 0.055 to 0.052 m3 m−3, respectively. Further validation of the GLASS SM product across
four independent soil moisture networks revealed its ability to capture the
temporal dynamics of measured soil moisture (R=0.69–0.89; ubRMSE =
0.033–0.048 m3 m−3). Lastly, the intercomparison between the
GLASS SM product and two global microwave soil moisture datasets – the 1 km
Soil Moisture Active Passive/Sentinel-1 L2 Radiometer/Radar soil moisture
product and the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative combined
soil moisture product at 0.25∘ – indicated that the derived
product maintained a more complete spatial coverage and exhibited high
spatiotemporal consistency with those two soil moisture products. The annual
average GLASS SM dataset from 2000 to 2020 can be freely downloaded from
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7172664 (Zhang et al., 2022a),
and the complete product at daily scale is available at
http://glass.umd.edu/soil_moisture/ (last access: 12 May 2023).
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference94 articles.
1. Abbaszadeh, P., Moradkhani, H., and Zhan, X.: Downscaling SMAP radiometer
soil moisture over the CONUS using an ensemble learning method, Water
Resour. Res., 55, 324–344, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023354, 2019. 2. Al Bitar, A., Mialon, A., Kerr, Y. H., Cabot, F., Richaume, P., Jacquette, E., Quesney, A., Mahmoodi, A., Tarot, S., Parrens, M., Al-Yaari, A., Pellarin, T., Rodriguez-Fernandez, N., and Wigneron, J.-P.: The global SMOS Level 3 daily soil moisture and brightness temperature maps, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 293–315, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-293-2017, 2017. 3. Al-Yaari, A., Wigneron, J.-P., Dorigo, W., Colliander, A., Pellarin, T.,
Hahn, S., Mialon, A., Richaume, P., Fernandez-Moran, R., Fan, L., Kerr, Y.
H., and De Lannoy, G.: Assessment and inter-comparison of recently
developed/reprocessed microwave satellite soil moisture products using ISMN
ground-based measurements, Remote Sens. Environ., 224, 289–303,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.008, 2019. 4. Anderson, W. B., Zaitchik, B. F., Hain, C. R., Anderson, M. C., Yilmaz, M. T., Mecikalski, J., and Schultz, L.: Towards an integrated soil moisture drought monitor for East Africa, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2893–2913, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2893-2012, 2012. 5. Babaeian, E., Sadeghi, M., Jones, S. B., Montzka, C., Vereecken, H., and
Tuller, M.: Ground, Proximal, and Satellite Remote Sensing of Soil Moisture,
Rev. Geophys., 57, 530–616, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000618, 2019.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|