Deconstruction of tropospheric chemical reactivity using aircraft measurements: the Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) data
-
Published:2023-07-31
Issue:7
Volume:15
Page:3299-3349
-
ISSN:1866-3516
-
Container-title:Earth System Science Data
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Syst. Sci. Data
Author:
Prather Michael J.ORCID, Guo HaoORCID, Zhu Xin
Abstract
Abstract. The NASA Atmospheric Tomography Mission (ATom) completed
four seasonal deployments (August 2016, February 2017, October 2017, May 2018), each with regular 0.2–12 km profiling by transecting the remote
Pacific Ocean and Atlantic Ocean basins. Additional data were also acquired for the Southern Ocean, the Arctic basin, and two flights over Antarctica.
ATom in situ measurements provide a near-complete chemical characterization
of the ∼ 140 000 10 s (80 m by 2 km) air parcels measured
along the flight path. This paper presents the Modeling Data Stream (MDS), a
continuous gap-filled record of the 10 s parcels containing the chemical
species needed to initialize a gas-phase chemistry model for the budgets of
tropospheric ozone and methane. Global 3D models have been used to calculate
the Reactivity Data Stream (RDS), which is comprised of the chemical
reactivities (production and loss) for methane, ozone, and carbon monoxide,
through 24 h integration of the 10 s parcels. These parcels accurately
sample tropospheric heterogeneity and allow us to partially deconstruct the
spatial scales and variability that define tropospheric chemistry from
composition to reactions. This paper provides a first look at and analysis of
the up-to-date MDS and RDS data including all four deployments (Prather et
al., 2023, https://doi.org/10.7280/D1B12H). ATom's regular profiling of the ocean basins allows for weighted averages to
build probability densities for the key species and reactivities presented here.
These statistics provide climatological metrics for global chemistry models,
e.g., the large-scale pattern of ozone and methane loss in the lower
troposphere and the more sporadic hotspots of ozone production in the
upper troposphere. The profiling curtains of reactivity also identify
meteorologically variable and hence deployment-specific hotspots of
photochemical activity. Added calculations of the sensitivities of the
production and loss terms relative to each species emphasize the few
dominant species that control the ozone and methane budgets and whose
statistical patterns should be key model–measurement metrics. From the
sensitivities, we also derive linearized lifetimes of ozone and methane on a
parcel-by-parcel basis and average over the basins, providing an
observational basis for these previously model-only diagnostics. We had
found that most model differences in the ozone and methane budgets are
caused by the models calculating different climatologies for the key species
such as O3, CO, H2O, NOx, CH4, and T, and thus these ATom
measurements make a substantial contribution to the understanding of
model differences and even identifying model errors in global tropospheric
chemistry.
Funder
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference34 articles.
1. Allen, H. M., Crounse, J. D., Kim, M. J., Teng, A. P., Ray, E. A., McKain,
K., Ray, E. A., Sweeney, C., and Wennberg, P. O.: H2O2 and CH3OOH (MHP) in the
remote atmosphere: 1. Global distribution and regional influences, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035701,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035701, 2022. 2. Anderson, D. C., Duncan, B. N., Fiore, A. M., Baublitz, C. B., Follette-Cook, M. B., Nicely, J. M., and Wolfe, G. M.: Spatial and temporal variability in the hydroxyl (OH) radical: understanding the role of large-scale climate features and their influence on OH through its dynamical and photochemical drivers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6481–6508, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6481-2021, 2021. 3. Brock, C. A., Froyd, K. D., Dollner, M., Williamson, C. J., Schill, G., Murphy, D. M., Wagner, N. J., Kupc, A., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Nault, B. A., Schroder, J. C., Day, D. A., Price, D. J., Weinzierl, B., Schwarz, J. P., Katich, J. M., Wang, S., Zeng, L., Weber, R., Dibb, J., Scheuer, E., Diskin, G. S., DiGangi, J. P., Bui, T., Dean-Day, J. M., Thompson, C. R., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Bourgeois, I., Daube, B. C., Commane, R., and Wofsy, S. C.: Ambient aerosol properties in the remote atmosphere from global-scale in situ measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15023–15063, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15023-2021, 2021. 4. Brune, W. H., Miller, D. O., Thames, A. B., Allen, H. M., Apel, E. C.,
Blake, D. R., Bui, T. P., Commane, R., Crounse, J. D., Daube, B. C., Diskin,
G. S., DiGangi, J. P., Elkins, J. W., Hall, S. R., Hanisco, T. F., Hannun,
R. A., Hintsa, E. J., Hornbrook, R. S., Kim, M. J., McKain, K., Moore, F.
L., Neuman, J. A., Nicely, J. M., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., St Clair, J.
M., Sweeney, C., Teng, A. P., Thompson, C., Ullmann, K., Veres, P. R.,
Wennberg, P. O., and Wolfe, G. M.: Exploring Oxidation in the Remote
Free Troposphere: Insights From Atmospheric Tomography (ATom), J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031685, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031685, 2020. 5. Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J. P. D., Barker, J. R., Cappa, C.,
Crounse, J. D., Dibble, T. S., Huie, R. E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Orkin,
V. L., Percival, C. J., Wilmouth, D. M., and Wine, P. H.: Chemical Kinetics
and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation No. 19,
JPL Publication 19-5, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, May 2020,
http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov (last access: 26 July 2023), 2020.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|