Inversion of the volume scattering function and spectral absorption in coastal waters with biogeochemical implications
Author:
Zhang X.ORCID, Huot Y., Gray D. J., Weidemann A., Rhea W. J.
Abstract
Abstract. In the aquatic environment, particles can be broadly separated into phytoplankton (PHY), non-algal particle (NAP) and dissolved (or very small particle, VSP) fractions. Typically, absorption spectra are inverted to quantify these fractions, but volume scattering functions (VSFs) can also be used. Both absorption spectra and VSFs were used to calculate particle fractions for an experiment in Chesapeake Bay. A complete set of water inherent optical properties was measured using a suite of commercial instruments and a prototype Multispectral Volume Scattering Meter (MVSM); the chlorophyll concentration, [Chl] was determined using the HPLC method. The total scattering coefficient (measured by an ac-s) and the VSF (at a few backward angles, measured by a HydroScat 6 and an ECO-VSF) agreed with the LISST and MVSM data within 5%, thus indicating inter-instrument consistency. The size distribution and scattering parameters for PHY, NAP and VSP were inverted from measured VSFs. For the absorption inversion, the "dissolved" absorption spectra were measured for filtrate passing through a 0.2 μm filter, whereas [Chl] and NAP absorption spectra were inverted from the particulate fraction. Even though the total scattering coefficient showed no correlation with [Chl], estimates of [Chl] from the VSF-inversion agreed well with the HPLC measurements (r = 0.68, mean relative error s = −20%). The scattering associated with NAP and VSP both correlated well with the NAP and "dissolved" absorption coefficients, respectively. While NAP dominated forward, and hence total, scattering, our results also suggest that the scattering by VSP was far from negligible and dominated backscattering.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference89 articles.
1. Aas,~E.: Refractive index of phytoplankton derived from its metabolite composition, J. Plankton Res., 18, 2223–2249, \\doi10.1093/plankt/18.12.2223, 1996. 2. Antoine,~D., Siegel,~D A., Kostadinov,~T., Maritorena,~S., Nelson,~N B., Gentili,~B., Vellucci,~V., and Guillocheau,~N.: Variability in optical particle backscattering in contrasting bio-optical oceanic regimes, Limnol. Oceanogr., 56, 955–973, 2011. 3. Babin,~M. and Stramski,~D.: Variations in the mass-specific absorption coefficient of mineral particles suspended in water, Limnol. Oceanogr., 49, 756–767, 2004. 4. Babin,~M., Stramski,~D., Ferrari,~G M., Claustre,~H., Bricaud,~A., Obolensky,~G., and Hoepffner,~N.: Variations in the light absorption coefficients of phytoplankton, nonalgal particles, and dissolved organic matter in coastal waters around Europe, J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 108, 3211, \\doi10.1029/2001JC000882, 2003. 5. Berthon,~J.-F., Shybanov,~E., Lee,~M E G., and Zibordi,~G.: Measurements and modeling of the volume scattering function in the coastal northern Adriatic Sea, Appl. Opt., 46, 5189–5203, 2007.
|
|