Author:
Randrianasolo A.,Ramos M. H.,Andréassian V.
Abstract
Abstract. In flow forecasting, additionally to the need of long time series of historic discharges for model setup and calibration, hydrological models also need real-time discharge data for the updating of the initial conditions at the time of the forecasts. The need of data challenges operational flow forecasting at ungauged or poorly gauged sites. This study evaluates the performance of different choices of parameter sets and discharge updates to run a flow forecasting model at ungauged sites, based on information from neighbour catchments. A cross-validation approach is applied on a set of 211 catchments in France and a 17-month forecasting period is used to calculate skill scores and evaluate the quality of the forecasts. A reference situation, where local information is available, is compared to alternative situations, which include scenarios where no local data is available at all and scenarios where local data started to be collected at the beginning of the forecasting period. To cope with uncertainties from rainfall forecasts, the model is driven by ensemble weather forecasts from the PEARP-Météo-France ensemble prediction system. The results show that neighbour catchments can contribute to provide forecasts of good quality at ungauged sites, especially with the transfer of parameter sets for model simulation. The added value of local data for the operational updating of the hydrological ensemble forecasts is highlighted.
Reference31 articles.
1. %Berthet, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Javelle P.: How crucial is it %to account for the antecedent moisture conditions in flood forecasting? %Comparison of event-based and continuous approaches on 178 catchments. %Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13: 819-831, 2009. Berthet, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., and Javelle, P.: How crucial is it to account for the antecedent moisture conditions in flood forecasting? Comparison of event-based and continuous approaches on 178 catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 819–831, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-819-2009, 2009.
2. Cloke, H. L. and Pappenberger, F.: Ensemble flood forecasting: A review, J. Hydrol., 375, 613–626, 2009.
3. Edijatno, S., Nascimento, N., Yang, X., Makhlouf, Z., and Michel, C.: GR3J: a daily watershed model with three free parameters, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 44(2), 263–278, 1999.
4. Haché, M., Ouarda, T.B.M.J., Bruneau, P., and Bobée, B.: Estimation régionale par la méthode de l'analyse canonique des corrélations: comparaison des types de variables hydrologiques. Can. J. Civil. Eng., 29, 899–910, 2002.
5. Jolliffe, I. T. and Stephenson D. B.: Forecast Verification. A Practitioner's Guide in Atmospheric Science, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, England, 240~pp., 2003.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献