Characteristic analysis of the differences between total electron content (TEC) values in global ionosphere map (GIM) grids
-
Published:2024-02-20
Issue:1
Volume:42
Page:45-53
-
ISSN:1432-0576
-
Container-title:Annales Geophysicae
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann. Geophys.
Author:
Wang QishengORCID, Zhu Jiaru, Yang Genxin
Abstract
Abstract. Using total electron content (TEC) from a global ionosphere map (GIM) for ionospheric delay correction is a common method of eliminating ionospheric errors in satellite navigation and positioning. On this basis, the TEC of a puncture point can be obtained by GIM grid TEC interpolation. However, in terms of grid, only few studies have analyzed the TEC value size characteristics of its four grid points, that is, the TEC difference characteristics among them. In view of this, by utilizing the GIM data from high solar-activity years (2014) and low solar-activity years (2021) provided by CODE (Center for Orbit Determination in Europe), this paper proposes the grid TEC difference as a way of analyzing TEC variation characteristics within the grid, which is conducive to exploring and analyzing the variation characteristics of the ionosphere TEC in the single-station area. The value is larger in high solar-activity years and generally small in low solar-activity years, and the value of high-latitude areas is always smaller than that of low-latitude areas. Specifically, in high solar-activity years, most of the GIM grid TEC internal differences are within 4 TECu (1 TECu = 1016 electrons m−2) in high-latitude and midlatitude regions, while only 78.17 % are in low-latitude regions. In low solar-activity years, the TEC difference values within a GIM grid are mostly less than 2 TECu, and most of them in the high and middle latitudes are within 1 TECu. The main finding of this analysis is that the grid TEC differences are small for most GIM grids, especially in the midlatitudes to high latitudes of low solar years. This means that relevant extraction methods and processes can be simplified when TEC within these GIM grids is needed.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference22 articles.
1. Chen, P., Liu, H., Ma, Y., and Zheng, N.: Accuracy and consistency of different global ionospheric maps released by IGS ionosphere associate analysis centers, Adv. Space Res., 65, 163–174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.042, 2020. 2. Feng, J., Zhu, Y., Zhang, T., and Zhang, Y.: Solar activity influence on the temporal and spatial variations of the Arctic and Antarctic ionosphere, Adv. Space Res., 70, 188–202, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.04.028, 2022. 3. Feng, J., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Han, B., Zhao, Z., Zhang, T., and Huang, R.: Analysis of ionospheric TEC response to solar and geomagnetic activities at different solar activity stages, Adv. Space Res., 71, 2225–2239, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.10.032, 2023. 4. Guo, J., Dong, Z., Liu, Z., Mao, J., and Zhang, H.: Study on ionosphere change over Shandong based from SDCORS in 2012, Geodesy Geodynam., 8, 229–237, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.04.003, 2017. 5. Hernández-Pajares, M., Juan, J. M., Sanz, J., Orus, R., Garcia-Rigo, A., Feltens, J., Komjathy, A., Schaer, S. C., and Krankowski, A.: The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998, J. Geodesy, 83, 263–275, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1, 2009.
|
|