Macroalgae contribute to nested mosaics of pH variability in a sub-Arctic fjord
Author:
Krause-Jensen D., Duarte C. M., Hendriks I. E.ORCID, Meire L., Blicher M. E., Marbà N.ORCID, Sejr M. K.
Abstract
Abstract. The Arctic Ocean is considered the most vulnerable ecosystem to ocean acidification (OA) and large-scale assessments of pH and the saturation state for aragonite (Ωarag) indicate that it is already close to corrosive states (Ωarag < 1). In high-latitude coastal waters the regulation of pH and Ωarag is far more complex than offshore because increased biological activity and input of glacial meltwater affect pH. As most calcifiers occupy coastal habitats, the assessment of risks from OA to these vulnerable organisms cannot be derived from extrapolation of current and forecasted offshore conditions, but requires an understanding of the regimes of pH and Ωarag in their coastal habitats. To increase knowledge of the natural variability of pH in the Arctic coastal zone and specifically to test the influence of benthic vegetated habitats, we quantified pH-variability in a Greenland fjord in a nested scale approach. A sensor array logging pH, O2, PAR, temperature and salinity was applied on spatial scales ranging from km-scale across the horizontal extension of the fjord, over 100 m scale vertically in the fjord, 10–100 m scale between subtidal habitats with and without kelp forests and between vegetated tidal pools and adjacent vegetated shores, to cm-m scale within kelp forests and mm-scale across boundary layers of macrophyte tissue. In addition, we assessed the temporal variability in pH on diurnal and seasonal scales. Based on pH-measurements combined with relationships between salinity, total alkalinity and dissolved inorganic carbon we also estimated variability of Ωarag. Results show variability in pH and Ωarag of up to 0.2–0.3 units at several scales, i.e. along the horizontal and vertical extension of the fjord, between seasons and on a diel basis in benthic habitats and within 1 m3 of kelp forest. Vegetated intertidal pools exhibited extreme diel pH variability of > 1.5 units and macrophyte boundary layers a pH-range of up to 0.8 units. Overall, Ωarag was favorable to calcification, and pelagic and benthic metabolism was an important driver of pH and Ωarag producing mosaics of variability from low levels in the dark to peak levels at high irradiance. We suggest that productive coastal environments may form niches of high pH in a future acidified Arctic Ocean.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference48 articles.
1. AMAP: AMAP Assessment 2013: Arctic Ocean Acidification, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo, Norway, viii + 99 pp., ISBN–978-82-7971-082-0, 2013. 2. Arendt, K. E., Juul-Pedersen, T., Mortensen, J., Blicher, M. E., and Rysgaard, S: A 5-year study of seasonal patterns in mesozooplankton community structure in a sub-Arctic fjord reveals dominance of Microsetella norvegica (Crustacea, Copepoda), J. Plankton Res., 35, 105–120, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbs087, 2013. 3. Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G., and Pabi, S.: Impact of a shrinking Arctic ice cover on marine primary production, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 1–6, 2008. 4. Attard, K. M., Glud, R. N., McGinnis, D. F., and Rysgaard, S.: Seasonal rates of benthic primary production in a Greenland fjord measured by aquatic eddy correlation, Limnol. Oceanogr., 59, 1555–1569, 2014. 5. Blicher, M. E. and Sejr, M. K.: Abundance, oxygen consumption and carbon demand of brittle stars in Young Sound and the NE Greenland shelf, Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser., 422, 139–144, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08915, 2011.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|