Hysteresis in permeability evolution simulated for a sandstone by mineral precipitation and dissolution
-
Published:2022-10-11
Issue:
Volume:58
Page:1-10
-
ISSN:1680-7359
-
Container-title:Advances in Geosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Adv. Geosci.
Author:
Wetzel MariaORCID, Kempka ThomasORCID, Kühn MichaelORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Mineral dissolution and precipitation can substantially affect rock permeability, which is a critical parameter for a broad range of geological subsurface applications. Virtual experiments on digital pore-scale samples represent a powerful and flexible approach to understand the impact of microstructural alterations on evolving hydraulic rock behaviour and quantify trends in permeability. In the present study, porosity-permeability relations are simulated for a precipitation-dissolution cycle within a typical reservoir sandstone. A hysteresis in permeability is observed depending on the geochemical process and dominating reaction regime, whereby permeability of the six investigated reaction paths varies by more than two orders of magnitude at a porosity of 17 %. Controlling parameters for this hysteresis phenomenon are the closure and re-opening of micro-scale flow channels, derived from changes in pore throat diameter and connectivity of the pore network. In general, a transport-limited regime exhibits a stronger impact on permeability than a reaction-limited regime, which uniformly alters the pore space. In case of mineral precipitation, higher permeability reduction results from successive clogging of pore throats, whereas in case of dissolution, permeability significantly increases due to a widening of existing flow paths. Both, the geochemical process and dominating reaction regime govern characteristic microstructural alterations, which cannot be simply reversed by the inversion of the geochemical processes itself. Hence, permeability evolution clearly depends on the hydrogeochemical history of the sample.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Chemical Engineering
Reference41 articles.
1. Andrä, H., Combaret, N., Dvorkin, J., Glatt, E., Han, J., Kabel, M.,
Keehm, Y., Krzikalla, F., Lee, M., Madonna, C., Marsh, M., Mukerji, T.,
Saenger, E., Sain, R., Saxena, N., Ricker, S., Wiegmann, A., and Zhan, X.:
Digital rock physics benchmarks – Part II: Computing effective properties,
Comput. Geosci., 50, 33–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.008,
2013. a 2. Beckingham, L.: Evaluation of macroscopic porosity-permeability relationships
in heterogeneous mineral dissolution and precipitation scenarios, Water
Resour. Res., 53, 10217–10230, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021306, 2017. a, b 3. Berg, C. F., Lopez, O., and Berland, H.: Industrial applications of digital
rock technology, J. Petr. Sci. Eng., 157,
131–147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.074, 2017. a 4. Bernabé, Y., Mok, U., and Evans, B.: Permeability-porosity relationships
in rocks subjected to various evolution processes, Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical
Coupling in Fractured Rock, 160, 937–960, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8083-1_9,
2003. a 5. Blunt, M., Bijeljic, B., Dong, H., Gharbi, O., Iglauer, S., Mostaghimi, P.,
Paluszny, A., and Pentland, C.: Pore-scale imaging and modelling, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 197–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.003,
2013. a
|
|