A remote field course implementing high-resolution topography acquisition with geomorphic applications
-
Published:2022-04-07
Issue:2
Volume:5
Page:101-117
-
ISSN:2569-7110
-
Container-title:Geoscience Communication
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Commun.
Author:
Bywater-Reyes SharonORCID, Pratt-Sitaula Beth
Abstract
Abstract. Here we describe the curriculum and outcomes from a data-intensive
geomorphic analysis course, “Geoscience Field Issues Using High-Resolution
Topography to Understand Earth Surface Processes”, which pivoted to virtual
in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The curriculum covers technologies for
manual and remotely sensed topographic data methods, including (1) Global
Positioning Systems and Global Navigation Satellite System (GPS/GNSS)
surveys, (2) Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry, and (3) ground-based
(terrestrial laser scanning, TLS) and airborne lidar. Course content focuses
on Earth-surface process applications but could be adapted for other
geoscience disciplines. Many other field courses were canceled in summer
2020, so this course served a broad range of undergraduate and graduate
students in need of a field course as part of degree or research
requirements. Resulting curricular materials are available freely within the
National Association of Geoscience Teachers' (NAGT's) “Teaching with Online Field Experiences” collection. The
authors pre-collected GNSS data, uncrewed-aerial-system-derived (UAS-derived) photographs, and ground-based lidar, which students then used in course
assignments. The course was run over a 2-week period and had synchronous
and asynchronous components. Students created SfM models that incorporated
post-processed GNSS ground control points and created derivative SfM and TLS
products, including classified point clouds and digital elevation models
(DEMs). Students were successfully able to (1) evaluate the appropriateness
of a given survey/data approach given site conditions, (2) assess pros and
cons of different data collection and post-processing methods in light of
field and time constraints and limitations of each, (3) conduct error and
geomorphic change analysis, and (4) propose or implement a protocol to answer
a geomorphic question. Overall, our analysis indicates the course had a
successful implementation that met student needs as well as course-specific
and NAGT learning outcomes, with 91 % of students receiving an A, B, or C
grade. Unexpected outcomes of the course included student self-reflection
and redirection and classmate support through a daily reflection and
discussion post. Challenges included long hours in front of a computer,
computing limitations, and burnout because of the condensed nature of the
course. Recommended implementation improvements include spreading the course
out over a longer period of time or adopting only part of the course and
providing appropriate computers and technical assistance. This paper
and published curricular materials should serve as an implementation and
assessment guide for the geoscience community to use in virtual or in-person
high-resolution topographic data courses that can be adapted for individual
labs or for an entire field or data course.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference27 articles.
1. Abbott, D.: Disrupting the “whiteness” of fieldwork in geography, Singap.
J. Trop. Geogr., 27, 326–341, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00265.x,
2006. 2. Abeyta, A., Fernandes, A. M., Mahon, R. C., and Swanson, T.: The true cost of
field education is a barrier to diversifying geosciences, Earth ArXiv, 12
[online], https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/2091/
(last access: 13 August 2021), 2020. 3. Ali, W.: Online and Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutes: A
Necessity in light of COVID-19 Pandemic, High. Educ. Stud., 10, 16,
https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16, 2020. 4. Anderson, S. W., Anderson, S. P., and Anderson, R. S.: Exhumation by debris
flows in the 2013 Colorado Front Range storm, Geology, 43, 391–394,
https://doi.org/10.1130/G36507.1, 2015. 5. Bemis, S. P., Micklethwaite, S., Turner, D., James, M. R., Akciz, S.,
Thiele, S. T., and Bangash, H. A.: Ground-based and UAV-Based photogrammetry:
A multi-scale, high-resolution mapping tool for structural geology and
paleoseismology, J. Struct. Geol., 69, 163–178,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2014.10.007, 2014.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|