Ocean carbon uptake under aggressive emission mitigation
-
Published:2021-04-30
Issue:8
Volume:18
Page:2711-2725
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Ridge Sean M.ORCID, McKinley Galen A.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Nearly every nation has signed the UNFCC Paris Agreement, committing to mitigate anthropogenic carbon emissions so as to limit the global mean temperature increase above pre-industrial levels to well below 2 ∘C, and ideally to no more than 1.5 ∘C. A consequence of emission mitigation that has received limited attention is a reduced efficiency of the ocean carbon sink. Historically, the roughly exponential increase in atmospheric CO2 has resulted in a proportional increase in anthropogenic carbon uptake by the ocean. We define growth of the ocean carbon sink exactly proportional to the atmospheric growth rate to be 100 % efficient. Using a model hierarchy consisting of a common reduced-form ocean carbon cycle model and the Community Earth System Model (CESM), we assess the mechanisms of future change in the efficiency of the ocean carbon sink under three emission scenarios: aggressive mitigation (1.5 ∘C), intermediate mitigation (RCP4.5), and high emissions (RCP8.5). The reduced-form ocean carbon cycle model is tuned to emulate the global-mean behavior of the CESM and then allows for mechanistic decomposition. With intermediate or no mitigation (RCP4.5, RCP8.5), changes in efficiency through 2080 are almost entirely the result of future reductions in the carbonate buffer capacity of the ocean. Under the 1.5 ∘C scenario, the dominant driver of efficiency decline is the ocean's reduced ability to transport anthropogenic carbon from surface to depth. As the global-mean upper-ocean gradient of anthropogenic carbon reverses sign, carbon can be re-entrained in surface waters where it slows further removal from the atmosphere. Reducing uncertainty in ocean circulation is critical to better understanding the transport of anthropogenic carbon from surface to depth and to improving quantification of its role in the future ocean carbon sink.
Funder
Earth Sciences Division National Science Foundation Columbia University
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference45 articles.
1. Arora, V. K., Boer, G. J., Friedlingstein, P., Eby, M., Jones, C. D.,
Christian, J. R., Bonan, G., Bopp, L., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Hajima, T.,
Ilyina, T., Lindsay, K., Tjiputra, J. F., and Wu, T.: Carbon-concentration
and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth system models, J.
Climate, 26, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00494.1, 2013. a, b 2. Bopp, L., Lévy, M., Resplandy, L., and Sallée, J. B.: Pathways of
anthropogenic carbon subduction in the global ocean, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 42, 6416–6423, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065073, 2015. a, b, c, d, e, f 3. Bronselaer, B. and Zanna, L.: Heat and carbon coupling reveals ocean warming
due to circulation changes, Nature, 584, 227–233,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2573-5, 2020. a, b, c 4. Canadell, J. G., Le Quéré, C., Raupach, M. R., Field, C. B., Buitenhuis,
E. T., Ciais, P., Conway, T. J., Gillett, N. P., Houghton, R. A., and
Marland, G.: Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from
economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 18866–18870, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702737104, 2007. a 5. DeVries, T.: The oceanic anthropogenic CO2 sink: Storage, air-sea
fluxes, and transports over the industrial era, Global Biogeochem. Cy.,
28, 631–647, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GB004739, 2014. a, b
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|