Ideas and perspectives: Strengthening the biogeosciences in environmental research networks
-
Published:2018-08-15
Issue:15
Volume:15
Page:4815-4832
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Richter Daniel D., Billings Sharon A., Groffman Peter M.ORCID, Kelly Eugene F., Lohse Kathleen A.ORCID, McDowell William H.ORCID, White Timothy S., Anderson SuzanneORCID, Baldocchi Dennis D.ORCID, Banwart Steve, Brantley SusanORCID, Braun Jean J.ORCID, Brecheisen Zachary S., Cook Charles W., Hartnett Hilairy E.ORCID, Hobbie Sarah E., Gaillardet JeromeORCID, Jobbagy Esteban, Jungkunst Hermann F., Kazanski Clare E.ORCID, Krishnaswamy Jagdish, Markewitz DanielORCID, O'Neill Katherine, Riebe Clifford S.ORCID, Schroeder Paul, Siebe Christina, Silver Whendee L., Thompson AaronORCID, Verhoef AnneORCID, Zhang Ganlin
Abstract
Abstract. Long-term environmental research networks are one approach to
advancing local, regional, and global environmental science and education. A
remarkable number and wide variety of environmental research networks operate
around the world today. These are diverse in funding, infrastructure,
motivating questions, scientific strengths, and the sciences that birthed and
maintain the networks. Some networks have individual sites that were
selected because they had produced invaluable long-term data, while other
networks have new sites selected to span ecological gradients. However, all
long-term environmental networks share two challenges. Networks must keep
pace with scientific advances and interact with both the scientific community
and society at large. If networks fall short of successfully addressing these
challenges, they risk becoming irrelevant. The objective of this paper is to
assert that the biogeosciences offer environmental research networks a number
of opportunities to expand scientific impact and public engagement. We
explore some of these opportunities with four networks: the International
Long-Term Ecological Research Network programs (ILTERs), critical zone
observatories (CZOs), Earth and ecological observatory networks (EONs),
and the FLUXNET program of eddy flux sites. While these networks were founded
and expanded by interdisciplinary scientists, the preponderance of expertise and
funding has gravitated activities of ILTERs and EONs toward ecology and
biology, CZOs toward the Earth sciences and geology, and FLUXNET toward
ecophysiology and micrometeorology. Our point is not to homogenize networks,
nor to diminish disciplinary science. Rather, we argue that by more fully
incorporating the integration of biology and geology in long-term
environmental research networks, scientists can better leverage network
assets, keep pace with the ever-changing science of the environment, and
engage with larger scientific and public audiences.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference126 articles.
1. Amiro, B. D., Barr, G. Black, T. A., Bracho, R. Brown, M. Chen, J., Clark, K.
L., Davis, K. J. Desai, A. R., Dore, S., Engel, V., and Fuentes, J. D.,
Goldstein, A. H., Goulden, M. L., Kolb, T. E., Lavigne, M. B., Law, B. E.,
Margolis, H. A., Martin, T., McCaughey, J. H., Misson, L., Montes-Helu, M.,
Noormets, A., Randerson, J. T., Starr, G., and Xiao, J.: Ecosystem carbon
dioxide fluxes after disturbance in forests of North America, J. Geophys.
Res., 115, G00K02, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001390,
2010. 2. Ashley, G. M.: Where are we headed? “Soft” rock research into the new
millennium, Geol. Soc. Am., Abstract/Program 30, A-148,
1998. 3. Baldocchi, D. D.: Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating
carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future, Glob.
Change Biol., 9, 479–492, 2003. 4. Baldocchi, D. D.: Measuring fluxes of trace gases and energy between
ecosystems and the atmosphere–the state and future of the eddy covariance
method, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 3600–3609, 2014. 5. Baldocchi, D. D., Falge, E., Gu, L., Olson, R., Hollinger, D., Running, S.,
Anthoni, P., Bernhofer, C., Davis, K., Evans, R., and Fuentes, J.: FLUXNET: A
new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale
carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities, Bull. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 82, 2415–2434, 2001.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|